Zsombor Piros vs Max Houkes — Ostrava CH Round of 32

Ostrava CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Zsombor Piros
HUN3
Zsombor Piros
#169ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 April 2026
clay
NED
Max Houkes
#239ATP
1460ELO
1444Clay ELO
26 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
Piros Z.
6-4 6-3
Houkes M.
Piros Z.
662
Houkes M.
430

Zsombor Piros defeated Max Houkes 6-4 6-3 in the Ostrava CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #169, defending the title.

Key context

  • Match story: Zsombor Piros closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Houkes M.

Houkes M.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Houkes M.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
69%
61%
Aces / match·Even
3.7
3.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (28 vs 21). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Houkes M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
55
23
Break points saved·Clear edge
84
66
Break points won·Even
32
29
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
34
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
36
16

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Piros Z.
7.6
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Houkes M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.1+177 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.9Clay Elo 1444
7.5Overall Elo 1661
ELO gap
2.5Overall Elo 1460
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.3
Surface form
7.3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
3.8
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Houkes M.
Freshness·Dominant
53
100

Piros Z.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 112 games (7d) · Houkes M.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Kolar Z.[6]
6-47-64
Semi-finals
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Gentzsch T.
3-66-46-1
Kolar Z.[6]
Brancaccio R.
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Svrcina D.[1]
6-45-76-2
Gentzsch T.
Molleker R.
6-14-66-3
Kolar Z.[6]
Fatic N.
6-26-3
Brancaccio R.
Cecchinato M.[7]
4-66-46-4
R16
Molleker R.
Squire H.
6-44-66-3
Fatic N.
Seyboth Wild T.
5-77-56-4
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Sachko V.[8]
6-777-56-4
Gentzsch T.
Piros Z.[3]
6-46-777-5
Cecchinato M.[7]
Johns G.
6-37-63
Brancaccio R.
Clarke J.
6-36-4
Kolar Z.[6]
Forejtek J.
6-46-3
Svrcina D.[1]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-36-4
R32
Fatic N.
Pinnington Jones J.[2]
6-27-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Sanchez Jover C.
6-26-757-65
Sachko V.[8]
Pavlovic L.
6-42-66-4
Forejtek J.
Barton H.
6-746-17-65
Seyboth Wild T.
Gombos N.
6-36-756-1
Svrcina D.[1]
Gill F.
6-766-16-3
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Mrva M.
7-636-3
Piros Z.[3]
Houkes M.
6-46-3
Gentzsch T.
Loffhagen G.
6-36-2
Molleker R.
Siniakov D.
7-646-0
Squire H.
Blanchet U.[5]
6-26-4
Brancaccio R.
Samuel T.[4]
5-76-16-4
Kolar Z.[6]
Jianu F.
6-32-66-3
Johns G.
Jermar J.
6-16-3
Cecchinato M.[7]
Michalski D.
6-36-2
Clarke J.
Schoenhaus M.
3-66-37-5