Nerman Fatic vs Thiago Seyboth Wild — Ostrava CH Round of 16

Ostrava CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#373ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 April 2026
clay
Thiago Seyboth Wild
BRA
Thiago Seyboth Wild
#243ATP
1532ELO
1516Clay ELO
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
Fatic N.
5-7 7-5 6-4
Seyboth Wild T.
Fatic N.
5762
Seyboth Wild T.
7541

Nerman Fatic defeated Thiago Seyboth Wild 5-7 7-5 6-4 in the Ostrava CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fatic N.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Seyboth Wild T.

Seyboth Wild T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Serve advantage — Seyboth Wild T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fatic N.Seyboth Wild T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
54%
Service points won·Even
60%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Clear edge
54%
67%
Aces / match·Even
3.4
3.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (15 vs 18). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fatic N.Seyboth Wild T.
Clutch Rating·Even
24
27
Break points saved·Dominant
63
93
Break points won·Slight edge
36
25
Deciding sets·Even
24
20
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
35
16

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fatic N.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Seyboth Wild T.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.8Clay Elo 1478
Surface ELO
5.2+38 Clay Elo edge
4.8Overall Elo 1496
ELO gap
5.2Overall Elo 1532
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.8
Surface form
4.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Fatic N.Seyboth Wild T.
Freshness·
—
84

Seyboth Wild T.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 52 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Kolar Z.[6]
6-47-64
Semi-finals
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Gentzsch T.
3-66-46-1
Kolar Z.[6]
Brancaccio R.
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Svrcina D.[1]
6-45-76-2
Gentzsch T.
Molleker R.
6-14-66-3
Kolar Z.[6]
Fatic N.
6-26-3
Brancaccio R.
Cecchinato M.[7]
4-66-46-4
R16
Molleker R.
Squire H.
6-44-66-3
Fatic N.
Seyboth Wild T.
5-77-56-4
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Sachko V.[8]
6-777-56-4
Gentzsch T.
Piros Z.[3]
6-46-777-5
Cecchinato M.[7]
Johns G.
6-37-63
Brancaccio R.
Clarke J.
6-36-4
Kolar Z.[6]
Forejtek J.
6-46-3
Svrcina D.[1]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-36-4
R32
Fatic N.
Pinnington Jones J.[2]
6-27-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Sanchez Jover C.
6-26-757-65
Sachko V.[8]
Pavlovic L.
6-42-66-4
Forejtek J.
Barton H.
6-746-17-65
Seyboth Wild T.
Gombos N.
6-36-756-1
Svrcina D.[1]
Gill F.
6-766-16-3
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Mrva M.
7-636-3
Piros Z.[3]
Houkes M.
6-46-3
Gentzsch T.
Loffhagen G.
6-36-2
Molleker R.
Siniakov D.
7-646-0
Squire H.
Blanchet U.[5]
6-26-4
Brancaccio R.
Samuel T.[4]
5-76-16-4
Kolar Z.[6]
Jianu F.
6-32-66-3
Johns G.
Jermar J.
6-16-3
Cecchinato M.[7]
Michalski D.
6-36-2
Clarke J.
Schoenhaus M.
3-66-37-5