Nerman Fatic vs Jack Pinnington Jones — Ostrava CH Round of 32

Ostrava CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 April 2026
clay
GBR2
Jack Pinnington Jones
#170ATP
1557ELO
1433Clay ELO
$211kYTD
$552kCAREER
23 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLLLL
Fatic N.
6-2 7-5
Pinnington Jones J.
Fatic N.
672
Pinnington Jones J.
250

Nerman Fatic defeated Jack Pinnington Jones 6-2 7-5 in the Ostrava CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Nerman Fatic closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fatic N.serving75% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Pinnington Jones J.

Pinnington Jones J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fatic N.Pinnington Jones J.
1st serve in·Even
61%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Clear edge
53%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.7
6.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.2
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (15 vs 25). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fatic N.Pinnington Jones J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
24
66
Break points saved·Dominant
63
89
Break points won·Clear edge
36
50
Deciding sets·Dominant
24
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
35
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fatic N.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Pinnington Jones J.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
4.9+45 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.1Clay Elo 1433
3.5Overall Elo 1496
ELO gap
6.5Overall Elo 1557
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
7.2
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
7.04-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Fatic N.Pinnington Jones J.
Freshness·
—
97

Pinnington Jones J.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Kolar Z.[6]
6-47-64
Semi-finals
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Gentzsch T.
3-66-46-1
Kolar Z.[6]
Brancaccio R.
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Svrcina D.[1]
6-45-76-2
Gentzsch T.
Molleker R.
6-14-66-3
Kolar Z.[6]
Fatic N.
6-26-3
Brancaccio R.
Cecchinato M.[7]
4-66-46-4
R16
Molleker R.
Squire H.
6-44-66-3
Fatic N.
Seyboth Wild T.
5-77-56-4
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Sachko V.[8]
6-777-56-4
Gentzsch T.
Piros Z.[3]
6-46-777-5
Cecchinato M.[7]
Johns G.
6-37-63
Brancaccio R.
Clarke J.
6-36-4
Kolar Z.[6]
Forejtek J.
6-46-3
Svrcina D.[1]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-36-4
R32
Fatic N.
Pinnington Jones J.[2]
6-27-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Sanchez Jover C.
6-26-757-65
Sachko V.[8]
Pavlovic L.
6-42-66-4
Forejtek J.
Barton H.
6-746-17-65
Seyboth Wild T.
Gombos N.
6-36-756-1
Svrcina D.[1]
Gill F.
6-766-16-3
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Mrva M.
7-636-3
Piros Z.[3]
Houkes M.
6-46-3
Gentzsch T.
Loffhagen G.
6-36-2
Molleker R.
Siniakov D.
7-646-0
Squire H.
Blanchet U.[5]
6-26-4
Brancaccio R.
Samuel T.[4]
5-76-16-4
Kolar Z.[6]
Jianu F.
6-32-66-3
Johns G.
Jermar J.
6-16-3
Cecchinato M.[7]
Michalski D.
6-36-2
Clarke J.
Schoenhaus M.
3-66-37-5