Jaime Faria vs Miguel Damas — Mauthausen CH Quarter-final

Mauthausen CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
POR7
Jaime Faria
#98ATP
1735ELO
1706Clay ELO
$531kYTD
$1.4MCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 April 2026
clay
ESP
Miguel Damas
#280ATP
1398ELO
1370Clay ELO
26 yrs · 208 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLWL
Faria J.
6-1 6-0
Damas M.
Faria J.
662
Damas M.
100

Jaime Faria defeated Miguel Damas 6-1 6-0 in the Mauthausen CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Jaime Faria came in ranked #98.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Faria J.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Damas M.

Damas M.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Faria J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Faria J.Damas M.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
56%
Return points won·Even
40%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
53%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.8
1.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.6
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (41 vs 32). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Faria J.Damas M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
54
0
Break points saved·Dominant
76
29
Break points won·Slight edge
22
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
81
1
Tiebreaks·Dominant
76
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Faria J.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Damas M.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.7+337 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.3Clay Elo 1370
7.7Overall Elo 1735
ELO gap
2.3Overall Elo 1398
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.0
Surface form
4.0
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
4.1
Minutes 14d
8.3
0.0
3-set count
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Faria J.Damas M.
Freshness·Dominant
88
62

Faria J.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Damas M.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 86 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Safiullin R.
Faria J.[7]
4-66-47-64
Semi-finals
Faria J.[7]
Blanch D.
6-36-2
Safiullin R.
Neumayer L.
6-33-66-2
Quarter-finals
Faria J.[7]
Damas M.
6-16-0
Blanch D.
Donald M.
6-36-4
Safiullin R.
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-33-66-1
Neumayer L.
Djere L.
7-646-3
R16
Blanch D.
Gaston H.[3]
3-66-36-0
Donald M.
Dedura Palomero D.
3-67-56-3
Djere L.
Choinski J.[4]
7-627-66
Faria J.[7]
Krumich M.
2-66-36-4
Neumayer L.
Barrios Vera T.[6]
7-646-4
Jorda Sanchis D.
Kopp S.
6-36-3
Safiullin R.
Droguet T.[2]
6-24-66-4
Damas M.
Brunold M.
6-36-1
R32
Brunold M.
Barrena A.
6-34-66-3
Donald M.
Mejia N.[8]
6-46-1
Djere L.
Engel J.
6-36-3
Jorda Sanchis D.
Cukierman D.
6-46-2
Dedura Palomero D.
Harris B.
6-706-26-3
Damas M.
Maestrelli F.[1]
7-626-4
Krumich M.
Topo M.
7-56-776-2
Droguet T.[2]
Skatov T.
6-26-1
Faria J.[7]
Guerrieri A.
6-36-726-4
Gaston H.[3]
Ujvary M.
6-06-1
Barrios Vera T.[6]
Sorger S.
6-12-66-4
Neumayer L.
Tseng C.
6-17-5
Choinski J.[4]
Schwaerzler J.
6-44-66-4
Safiullin R.
Cretu C.
6-26-4
Blanch D.
Rodionov J.
1-66-17-66
Kopp S.
Basilashvili N.[5]
6-36-4