James Mccabe vs Dane Sweeny — Gwangju CH Round of 16

Gwangju CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
AUS
James Mccabe
#242ATP
1532ELO
1481Hard ELO
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 20 April 2026
hard
AUS4
Dane Sweeny
#122ATP
1460ELO
1444Hard ELO
$256kYTD
$861kCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Mccabe J.
6-7 6-1 7-6
Sweeny D.
Mccabe J.
6667102
Sweeny D.
781681

James Mccabe defeated Dane Sweeny 6-7 6-1 7-6 in the Gwangju CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mccabe J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Sweeny D.

Sweeny D.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Mccabe J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mccabe J.Sweeny D.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.7
3.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.2
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (20 vs 29). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mccabe J.Sweeny D.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
37
45
Break points saved·Clear edge
85
69
Break points won·Even
9
11
Deciding sets·Even
71
68
Tiebreaks·Dominant
12
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mccabe J.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Sweeny D.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.5+38 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.5Hard Elo 1444
4.6Overall Elo 1532
ELO gap
5.4Overall Elo 1460
4.6No prior meetings
H2H
5.4
3.0
Surface form
1.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 6
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
7.9
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mccabe J.Sweeny D.
Freshness·Even
94
97

Mccabe J.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d) · Sweeny D.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Kwon S.
Holmgren A.
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Holmgren A.
Riedi L.[7]
4-3
Kwon S.
Hsu Y.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Riedi L.[7]
Mccabe J.
6-16-4
Holmgren A.
Shimizu Y.
7-666-4
Kwon S.
Chung H.
3-66-26-4
Hsu Y.
Schoolkate T.[2]
7-696-4
R16
Shimizu Y.
Shimabukuro S.[1]
0-67-666-4
Holmgren A.
Galarneau A.
6-46-3
Mccabe J.
Sweeny D.[4]
6-766-17-68
Riedi L.[7]
Kukushkin M.
6-36-2
Kwon S.
Simakin I.
7-616-3
Chung H.
Chidekh C.
7-57-5
Hsu Y.
Lajal M.[6]
7-6106-736-3
Schoolkate T.[2]
Broady L.
6-766-36-2
R32
Shimizu Y.
Uchiyama Y.
6-727-50-0
Shimabukuro S.[1]
Park U.
7-646-1
Mccabe J.
Uchida K.
6-47-5
Kukushkin M.
Kotov P.
1-66-26-3
Simakin I.
Bolt A.[5]
7-653-66-1
Chidekh C.
Wong C.[3]
3-66-26-1
Lajal M.[6]
Jones M.
7-55-77-66
Broady L.
Zhukayev B.
6-26-1
Hsu Y.
Cassone M.
6-34-3
Holmgren A.
Yunchaokete B.[8]
6-46-4
Sweeny D.[4]
Wu T.
6-31-66-1
Riedi L.[7]
Sharipov M.
3-66-47-5
Chung H.
Jung J.
6-36-4
Schoolkate T.[2]
Matsuoka H.
6-06-4
Galarneau A.
Noguchi R.
6-46-2
Kwon S.
Masur D.
6-27-65