Clement Tabur vs Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg — Tallahassee CH Round of 32

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Clement Tabur
FRA5
Clement Tabur
#189ATP
1607ELO
1553Clay ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWWLWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 13 April 2026
clay
FRA
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
#283ATP
1413ELO
1369Clay ELO
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLLL
Tabur C.
6-1 3-0
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Tabur C.
63–
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
10–

Clement Tabur advanced when Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg retired 6-1 3-0 in the Tallahassee CH round of 32.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tabur C.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gueymard Wayenburg S.

Gueymard Wayenburg S.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Serve advantage — Tabur C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tabur C.Gueymard Wayenburg S.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
48%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.4
7.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (32 vs 25). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tabur C.Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
29
10
Break points saved·Slight edge
74
63
Break points won·Even
23
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
33
5
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
40
27

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tabur C.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.8+184 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.2Clay Elo 1369
7.2Overall Elo 1607
ELO gap
2.8Overall Elo 1413
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
5.2
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.4
Minutes 14d
9.1
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tabur C.Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Freshness·Slight edge
78
70

Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d) · Gueymard Wayenburg S.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 57 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tabur C.[5]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-41-0
Semi-finals
Reis Da Silva J.
Kennedy J.
6-22-66-4
Tabur C.[5]
Mmoh M.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Tabur C.[5]
Zink T.
6-16-4
Mmoh M.
Barton H.
6-37-65
Reis Da Silva J.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-44-66-4
Kennedy J.
Glinka D.[4]
6-46-4
R16
Reis Da Silva J.
Draxl L.[1]
6-37-5
Kennedy J.
Crawford O.
7-644-67-5
Zink T.
Krueger M.
6-16-2
Boscardin Dias P.
Rybakov A.
2-67-57-5
Glinka D.[4]
Blanch D.
6-36-4
Tabur C.[5]
Martin A.
6-35-76-3
Barton H.
Johns G.
6-46-4
Mmoh M.
Kingsley C.
4-67-646-4
R32
Reis Da Silva J.
Kicker N.
6-26-3
Crawford O.
Ajdukovic D.
6-36-4
Tabur C.[5]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-13-0
Kennedy J.
Neumayer L.[7]
3-66-44-0
Zink T.
Purtseladze S.
4-67-666-1
Krueger M.
Dutra Da Silva D.
2-66-36-4
Johns G.
Smith C.[6]
7-666-1
Barton H.
Kuzuhara B.
4-66-46-3
Kingsley C.
Popko D.
6-33-67-5
Mmoh M.
Gomez F.[2]
6-26-1
Rybakov A.
Kozlov S.
7-636-2
Glinka D.[4]
Dostanic S.
6-27-63
Martin A.
Langmo C.
6-47-5
Blanch D.
Galan D.
3-66-16-4
Boscardin Dias P.
Olivieri G.[8]
4-66-46-3
Draxl L.[1]
Bigun K.
3-66-26-1