Clement Tabur vs Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva — Tallahassee CH Final

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Clement Tabur
FRA5
Clement Tabur
#189ATP
1607ELO
1553Clay ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWWLWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 13 April 2026
clay
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
BRA
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
#236ATP
1486ELO
1470Clay ELO
$76kYTD
$371kCAREER
26 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
Tabur C.
6-4 1-0
Reis Da Silva J.
Tabur C.
61–
Reis Da Silva J.
40–

Clement Tabur advanced when Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva retired 6-4 1-0 in the Tallahassee CH final.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tabur C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Reis Da Silva J.

Reis Da Silva J.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Serve advantage — Tabur C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tabur C.Reis Da Silva J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.4
2.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (32 vs 25). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tabur C.Reis Da Silva J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
29
12
Break points saved·Dominant
74
49
Break points won·Clear edge
23
43
Deciding sets·Clear edge
33
9
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
40
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tabur C.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Reis Da Silva J.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.9+83 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.1Clay Elo 1470
6.6Overall Elo 1607
ELO gap
3.4Overall Elo 1486
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
3.0
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
6.4
Minutes 14d
9.2
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tabur C.Reis Da Silva J.
Freshness·Clear edge
78
100

Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d) · Reis Da Silva J.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tabur C.[5]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-41-0
Semi-finals
Reis Da Silva J.
Kennedy J.
6-22-66-4
Tabur C.[5]
Mmoh M.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Tabur C.[5]
Zink T.
6-16-4
Mmoh M.
Barton H.
6-37-65
Reis Da Silva J.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-44-66-4
Kennedy J.
Glinka D.[4]
6-46-4
R16
Reis Da Silva J.
Draxl L.[1]
6-37-5
Kennedy J.
Crawford O.
7-644-67-5
Zink T.
Krueger M.
6-16-2
Boscardin Dias P.
Rybakov A.
2-67-57-5
Glinka D.[4]
Blanch D.
6-36-4
Tabur C.[5]
Martin A.
6-35-76-3
Barton H.
Johns G.
6-46-4
Mmoh M.
Kingsley C.
4-67-646-4
R32
Reis Da Silva J.
Kicker N.
6-26-3
Crawford O.
Ajdukovic D.
6-36-4
Tabur C.[5]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-13-0
Kennedy J.
Neumayer L.[7]
3-66-44-0
Zink T.
Purtseladze S.
4-67-666-1
Krueger M.
Dutra Da Silva D.
2-66-36-4
Johns G.
Smith C.[6]
7-666-1
Barton H.
Kuzuhara B.
4-66-46-3
Kingsley C.
Popko D.
6-33-67-5
Mmoh M.
Gomez F.[2]
6-26-1
Rybakov A.
Kozlov S.
7-636-2
Glinka D.[4]
Dostanic S.
6-27-63
Martin A.
Langmo C.
6-47-5
Blanch D.
Galan D.
3-66-16-4
Boscardin Dias P.
Olivieri G.[8]
4-66-46-3
Draxl L.[1]
Bigun K.
3-66-26-1