Tyler Zink vs Joshua Sheehy — Tallahassee CH Qualifying Round 1
Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 April 2026
clay
Umpiry Score
Pre-match6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limitedForm & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H5.0
3.6
Surface form4.9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d8.3
0.0
3-set count7.0
Prev. match8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts5.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Zink T.
662
Sheehy J.
240
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Statistics
Recent form58%1st serve in+2%56%
72%1st serve points won+2%74%
54%2nd serve points won+1%53%
64%Service points won+1%65%
39%Return points won+3%36%
64%Break points saved+6%70%
5.6Aces / match+2.88.4
1.5Double faults / match+3.55
Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw — qualifying
Q2
Kozlov S.[1]
Feldbausch K.[9]
6-14-67-62
Langmo C.[11]
Magadan A.
7-56-3
Barton H.[3]
Vandecasteele Q.[10]
6-26-3
Zink T.[4]
Faurel T.[8]
6-06-3
Kuzuhara B.
Martin D.[5]
6-36-3
Johns G.[7]
Dutra Da Silva D.[6]
7-642-67-65
Q1
Kozlov S.[1]
Kirchheimer S.
6-06-4
Feldbausch K.[9]
Colby R.
6-16-2
Magadan A.
Cid R.
4-66-26-4
Langmo C.[11]
Ingildsen J.
6-16-1
Vandecasteele Q.[10]
Martinez L.
6-26-2
Zink T.[4]
Sheehy J.
6-26-4
Faurel T.[8]
Hornung G.
7-56-2
Martin D.[5]
Arias B.
6-46-3
Kuzuhara B.
Alves M.[12]
4-66-46-2
Dutra Da Silva D.[6]
Mayo A.
6-26-1
Johns G.[7]
Hohmann R.
6-26-4
Barton H.[3]
Hance K.
6-47-5