Tyler Zink vs Joshua Sheehy — Tallahassee CH Qualifying Round 1

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
USA4
Tyler Zink
#330ATP
1371ELO
1294Clay ELO
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 April 2026
clay
USA
Joshua Sheehy
#586ATP
29 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWL
Zink T.
6-2 6-4
Sheehy J.
Zink T.
662
Sheehy J.
240

Tyler Zink defeated Joshua Sheehy 6-2 6-4 in the Tallahassee CH qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zink T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Sheehy J.

Sheehy J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Zink T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zink T.Sheehy J.
1st serve in·Even
59%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
65%
68%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.4
8.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.6
4.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (28 vs 17). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zink T.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Sheehy J.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
4.9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
8.3
0.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Zink T.Sheehy J.
Freshness·
82
—

Zink T.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 59 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Johns G.[7]
Dutra Da Silva D.[6]
7-642-67-65
Kuzuhara B.
Martin D.[5]
6-36-3
Kozlov S.[1]
Feldbausch K.[9]
6-14-67-62
Langmo C.[11]
Magadan A.
7-56-3
Barton H.[3]
Vandecasteele Q.[10]
6-26-3
Zink T.[4]
Faurel T.[8]
6-06-3
Q1
Kozlov S.[1]
Kirchheimer S.
6-06-4
Feldbausch K.[9]
Colby R.
6-16-2
Langmo C.[11]
Ingildsen J.
6-16-1
Kuzuhara B.
Alves M.[12]
4-66-46-2
Magadan A.
Cid R.
4-66-26-4
Barton H.[3]
Hance K.
6-47-5
Vandecasteele Q.[10]
Martinez L.
6-26-2
Zink T.[4]
Sheehy J.
6-26-4
Faurel T.[8]
Hornung G.
7-56-2
Martin D.[5]
Arias B.
6-46-3
Johns G.[7]
Hohmann R.
6-26-4
Dutra Da Silva D.[6]
Mayo A.
6-26-1