Xin Yu Wang vs Chloe Paquet — Rouen Round of 32

Rouen · WTA · Round of 32
CHN
Xin Yu Wang
1760ELO
1634Clay ELO
24 yrs · 182 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 April 2026
clay
Chloe Paquet
FRA
Chloe Paquet
#297WTA
1479ELO
1456Clay ELO
32 yrs · 179 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLWW
Wang X.
3-6 6-4 6-3
Paquet C.
Wang X.
3662
Paquet C.
6431

Xin Yu Wang defeated Chloe Paquet 3-6 6-4 6-3 in the Rouen round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wang X.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Paquet C.

Paquet C.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Wang X.

Serve advantage — Wang X.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Wang X.Paquet C.
—
Serve
—
0
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wang X.Paquet C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
44%
Service points won·Even
58%
55%
Return points won·Even
43%
42%
Break points saved·Even
55%
52%
Aces / match·Even
2.6
2.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
4.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (21 vs 24). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wang X.Paquet C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
60
8
Break points saved·Dominant
86
51
Break points won·Slight edge
78
69
Deciding sets·Dominant
86
0
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
29

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wang X.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 27 days (−0.3)
Paquet C.
3.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 34 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
7.9+178 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.1Clay Elo 1456
9.0Overall Elo 1760
ELO gap
1.0Overall Elo 1479
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
2.3
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Kostyuk M.[1]
Podrez V.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Podrez V.
Cirstea S.[2]
W/O
Kostyuk M.[1]
Maria T.
6-36-0
Quarter-finals
Kostyuk M.[1]
Li A.[5]
6-06-746-3
Podrez V.
Boulter K.
6-46-1
Maria T.
Shymanovich I.
7-656-2
Cirstea S.[2]
Bondar A.
7-626-2
R16
Cirstea S.[2]
Wang X.
5-3
Kostyuk M.[1]
Mcnally C.
2-66-26-1
Bondar A.
Oliynykova O.
6-04-66-0
Podrez V.
Cocciaretto E.[7]
7-654-66-4
Li A.[5]
Rakhimova K.
4-66-26-3
Shymanovich I.
Baptiste H.[4]
6-35-76-3
Maria T.
Salkova D.
6-36-2
Boulter K.
Cristian J.[3]
7-654-66-1
R32
Cristian J.[3]
Rakotomanga Rajaonah T.
2-67-667-5
Salkova D.
Blinkova A.
7-56-1
Maria T.
Jacquemot E.[9]
6-46-3
Boulter K.
Timofeeva M.
6-26-2
Li A.[5]
Kasatkina D.
6-766-26-4
Mcnally C.
Volynets K.
1-66-16-1
Wang X.
Paquet C.
3-66-46-3
Bondar A.
Tan H.
6-24-66-0
Cocciaretto E.[7]
Charaeva A.
6-34-66-2
Kostyuk M.[1]
Parry D.
6-16-4
Shymanovich I.
Fruhvirtova L.
6-37-5
Podrez V.
Stephens S.
6-26-1
Cirstea S.[2]
Ferro F.
6-36-757-62
Baptiste H.[4]
Ponchet J.
3-67-666-2
Rakhimova K.
Kalieva E.
6-37-61
Oliynykova O.
Tagger L.
6-34-66-4