Clement Tabur vs Michael Mmoh — Tallahassee CH Semi-final

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Clement Tabur
FRA5
Clement Tabur
#189ATP
1607ELO
1553Clay ELO
$199kYTD
$640kCAREER
26 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 April 2026
clay
Michael Mmoh
USA
Michael Mmoh
#192ATP
1613ELO
1508Clay ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
Tabur C.
6-4 6-2
Mmoh M.
Tabur C.
662
Mmoh M.
420

Clement Tabur defeated Michael Mmoh 6-4 6-2 in the Tallahassee CH semi-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tabur C.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Mmoh M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Tabur C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tabur C.Mmoh M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
74%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
45%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
63%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.4
6.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.4
5.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (32 vs 32). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tabur C.Mmoh M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
29
66
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
91
Break points won·Slight edge
23
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
33
90
Tiebreaks·Dominant
40
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tabur C.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Mmoh M.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.3+45 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.7Clay Elo 1508
4.8Overall Elo 1607
ELO gap
5.2Overall Elo 1613
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
2.8
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.4
Minutes 14d
9.1
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tabur C.Mmoh M.
Freshness·Clear edge
78
93

Tabur C.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d) · Mmoh M.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tabur C.[5]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-41-0
Semi-finals
Reis Da Silva J.
Kennedy J.
6-22-66-4
Tabur C.[5]
Mmoh M.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Tabur C.[5]
Zink T.
6-16-4
Mmoh M.
Barton H.
6-37-65
Reis Da Silva J.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-44-66-4
Kennedy J.
Glinka D.[4]
6-46-4
R16
Reis Da Silva J.
Draxl L.[1]
6-37-5
Kennedy J.
Crawford O.
7-644-67-5
Zink T.
Krueger M.
6-16-2
Boscardin Dias P.
Rybakov A.
2-67-57-5
Glinka D.[4]
Blanch D.
6-36-4
Tabur C.[5]
Martin A.
6-35-76-3
Barton H.
Johns G.
6-46-4
Mmoh M.
Kingsley C.
4-67-646-4
R32
Reis Da Silva J.
Kicker N.
6-26-3
Crawford O.
Ajdukovic D.
6-36-4
Tabur C.[5]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-13-0
Kennedy J.
Neumayer L.[7]
3-66-44-0
Zink T.
Purtseladze S.
4-67-666-1
Krueger M.
Dutra Da Silva D.
2-66-36-4
Johns G.
Smith C.[6]
7-666-1
Barton H.
Kuzuhara B.
4-66-46-3
Kingsley C.
Popko D.
6-33-67-5
Mmoh M.
Gomez F.[2]
6-26-1
Rybakov A.
Kozlov S.
7-636-2
Glinka D.[4]
Dostanic S.
6-27-63
Martin A.
Langmo C.
6-47-5
Blanch D.
Galan D.
3-66-16-4
Boscardin Dias P.
Olivieri G.[8]
4-66-46-3
Draxl L.[1]
Bigun K.
3-66-26-1