Andres Martin vs Christian Langmo — Tallahassee CH Round of 32

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Andres Martin
USA
Andres Martin
1337ELO
1306Clay ELO
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 April 2026
clay
Christian Langmo
USA
Christian Langmo
#464ATP
1267ELO
1141Clay ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
Martin A.
6-4 7-5
Langmo C.
Martin A.
672
Langmo C.
450

Andres Martin defeated Christian Langmo 6-4 7-5 in the Tallahassee CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Martin A.serving70% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Langmo C.

Langmo C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Martin A.

Serve advantage — Langmo C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Martin A.Langmo C.
1st serve in·Even
67%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Clear edge
56%
70%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.9
6.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (25 vs 29). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Martin A.Langmo C.
Clutch Rating·Even
26
22
Break points saved·Dominant
60
88
Break points won·Clear edge
14
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
50
22
Tiebreaks·Even
33
34

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Martin A.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Langmo C.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.4+165 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.6Clay Elo 1141
6.1Overall Elo 1337
ELO gap
3.9Overall Elo 1267
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.3
Surface form
5.6
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
7.6
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Martin A.Langmo C.
Freshness·Clear edge
79
98

Martin A.: 6 days rest · 3 matches, 76 games (7d) · Langmo C.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tabur C.[5]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-41-0
Semi-finals
Reis Da Silva J.
Kennedy J.
6-22-66-4
Tabur C.[5]
Mmoh M.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Tabur C.[5]
Zink T.
6-16-4
Mmoh M.
Barton H.
6-37-65
Reis Da Silva J.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-44-66-4
Kennedy J.
Glinka D.[4]
6-46-4
R16
Reis Da Silva J.
Draxl L.[1]
6-37-5
Kennedy J.
Crawford O.
7-644-67-5
Zink T.
Krueger M.
6-16-2
Boscardin Dias P.
Rybakov A.
2-67-57-5
Glinka D.[4]
Blanch D.
6-36-4
Tabur C.[5]
Martin A.
6-35-76-3
Barton H.
Johns G.
6-46-4
Mmoh M.
Kingsley C.
4-67-646-4
R32
Reis Da Silva J.
Kicker N.
6-26-3
Crawford O.
Ajdukovic D.
6-36-4
Tabur C.[5]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-13-0
Kennedy J.
Neumayer L.[7]
3-66-44-0
Zink T.
Purtseladze S.
4-67-666-1
Krueger M.
Dutra Da Silva D.
2-66-36-4
Johns G.
Smith C.[6]
7-666-1
Barton H.
Kuzuhara B.
4-66-46-3
Kingsley C.
Popko D.
6-33-67-5
Mmoh M.
Gomez F.[2]
6-26-1
Rybakov A.
Kozlov S.
7-636-2
Glinka D.[4]
Dostanic S.
6-27-63
Martin A.
Langmo C.
6-47-5
Blanch D.
Galan D.
3-66-16-4
Boscardin Dias P.
Olivieri G.[8]
4-66-46-3
Draxl L.[1]
Bigun K.
3-66-26-1