Tyler Zink vs Mitchell Krueger — Tallahassee CH Round of 16

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA
Tyler Zink
#330ATP
1371ELO
1294Clay ELO
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 April 2026
clay
Mitchell Krueger
USA
Mitchell Krueger
#349ATP
1461ELO
1427Clay ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
Zink T.
6-1 6-2
Krueger M.
Zink T.
662
Krueger M.
120

Tyler Zink defeated Mitchell Krueger 6-1 6-2 in the Tallahassee CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zink T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Krueger M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Zink T.

Serve advantage — Zink T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zink T.Krueger M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
47%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.4
2.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.6
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (28 vs 21). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zink T.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Krueger M.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.3Clay Elo 1294
Surface ELO
6.7+134 Clay Elo edge
3.7Overall Elo 1371
ELO gap
6.3Overall Elo 1461
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
3.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 12
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
7.5
0.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Zink T.Krueger M.
Freshness·Clear edge
79
99

Zink T.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 59 games (7d) · Krueger M.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tabur C.[5]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-41-0
Semi-finals
Reis Da Silva J.
Kennedy J.
6-22-66-4
Tabur C.[5]
Mmoh M.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Tabur C.[5]
Zink T.
6-16-4
Mmoh M.
Barton H.
6-37-65
Reis Da Silva J.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-44-66-4
Kennedy J.
Glinka D.[4]
6-46-4
R16
Reis Da Silva J.
Draxl L.[1]
6-37-5
Kennedy J.
Crawford O.
7-644-67-5
Zink T.
Krueger M.
6-16-2
Boscardin Dias P.
Rybakov A.
2-67-57-5
Glinka D.[4]
Blanch D.
6-36-4
Tabur C.[5]
Martin A.
6-35-76-3
Barton H.
Johns G.
6-46-4
Mmoh M.
Kingsley C.
4-67-646-4
R32
Reis Da Silva J.
Kicker N.
6-26-3
Crawford O.
Ajdukovic D.
6-36-4
Tabur C.[5]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-13-0
Kennedy J.
Neumayer L.[7]
3-66-44-0
Zink T.
Purtseladze S.
4-67-666-1
Krueger M.
Dutra Da Silva D.
2-66-36-4
Johns G.
Smith C.[6]
7-666-1
Barton H.
Kuzuhara B.
4-66-46-3
Kingsley C.
Popko D.
6-33-67-5
Mmoh M.
Gomez F.[2]
6-26-1
Rybakov A.
Kozlov S.
7-636-2
Glinka D.[4]
Dostanic S.
6-27-63
Martin A.
Langmo C.
6-47-5
Blanch D.
Galan D.
3-66-16-4
Boscardin Dias P.
Olivieri G.[8]
4-66-46-3
Draxl L.[1]
Bigun K.
3-66-26-1