Michael Mmoh vs Cannon Kingsley — Tallahassee CH Round of 16

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Michael Mmoh
USA
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1508Clay ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 April 2026
clay
USA
Cannon Kingsley
#421ATP
1342ELO
1262Clay ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWLWWLWW
Mmoh M.
4-6 7-6 6-4
Kingsley C.
Mmoh M.
47762
Kingsley C.
66441

Michael Mmoh defeated Cannon Kingsley 4-6 7-6 6-4 in the Tallahassee CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Michael Mmoh came in ranked #188, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mmoh M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Kingsley C.

Kingsley C.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mmoh M.Kingsley C.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
45%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
65%
65%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.7
6.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.6
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (32 vs 23). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mmoh M.Kingsley C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
66
21
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
74
Break points won·Clear edge
31
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
90
27
Tiebreaks·Dominant
77
20

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mmoh M.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Kingsley C.
4.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.1+246 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.9Clay Elo 1262
8.4Overall Elo 1613
ELO gap
1.6Overall Elo 1342
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
2.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
8.9
8.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mmoh M.Kingsley C.
Freshness·
94
—

Mmoh M.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tabur C.[5]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-41-0
Semi-finals
Reis Da Silva J.
Kennedy J.
6-22-66-4
Tabur C.[5]
Mmoh M.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Tabur C.[5]
Zink T.
6-16-4
Mmoh M.
Barton H.
6-37-65
Reis Da Silva J.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-44-66-4
Kennedy J.
Glinka D.[4]
6-46-4
R16
Reis Da Silva J.
Draxl L.[1]
6-37-5
Kennedy J.
Crawford O.
7-644-67-5
Zink T.
Krueger M.
6-16-2
Boscardin Dias P.
Rybakov A.
2-67-57-5
Glinka D.[4]
Blanch D.
6-36-4
Tabur C.[5]
Martin A.
6-35-76-3
Barton H.
Johns G.
6-46-4
Mmoh M.
Kingsley C.
4-67-646-4
R32
Reis Da Silva J.
Kicker N.
6-26-3
Crawford O.
Ajdukovic D.
6-36-4
Tabur C.[5]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-13-0
Kennedy J.
Neumayer L.[7]
3-66-44-0
Zink T.
Purtseladze S.
4-67-666-1
Krueger M.
Dutra Da Silva D.
2-66-36-4
Johns G.
Smith C.[6]
7-666-1
Barton H.
Kuzuhara B.
4-66-46-3
Kingsley C.
Popko D.
6-33-67-5
Mmoh M.
Gomez F.[2]
6-26-1
Rybakov A.
Kozlov S.
7-636-2
Glinka D.[4]
Dostanic S.
6-27-63
Martin A.
Langmo C.
6-47-5
Blanch D.
Galan D.
3-66-16-4
Boscardin Dias P.
Olivieri G.[8]
4-66-46-3
Draxl L.[1]
Bigun K.
3-66-26-1