Garrett Johns vs Colton Smith — Tallahassee CH Round of 32

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Garrett Johns
USA
Garrett Johns
#382ATP
1336ELO
1291Clay ELO
25 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 April 2026
clay
USA6
Colton Smith
#186ATP
1577ELO
1476Clay ELO
$154kYTD
$480kCAREER
23 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWWW
Johns G.
7-6 6-1
Smith C.
Johns G.
7862
Smith C.
6610

Garrett Johns defeated Colton Smith 7-6 6-1 in the Tallahassee CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Garrett Johns came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Johns G.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Smith C.

Smith C.serving70% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Johns G.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Johns G.Smith C.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
4.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.7
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (25 vs 26). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Johns G.Smith C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
36
62
Break points saved·Dominant
66
94
Break points won·Dominant
3
52
Deciding sets·Even
90
92
Tiebreaks·Even
12
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Johns G.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Smith C.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.2Clay Elo 1291
Surface ELO
5.8+185 Clay Elo edge
3.1Overall Elo 1336
ELO gap
6.9Overall Elo 1577
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
3.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 9
Fatigue & Travel
5.6
Minutes 14d
8.1
4.0
3-set count
4.0
4.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Johns G.Smith C.
Freshness·Dominant
63
100

Johns G.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 95 games (7d) · Smith C.: 17 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tabur C.[5]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-41-0
Semi-finals
Reis Da Silva J.
Kennedy J.
6-22-66-4
Tabur C.[5]
Mmoh M.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Tabur C.[5]
Zink T.
6-16-4
Mmoh M.
Barton H.
6-37-65
Reis Da Silva J.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-44-66-4
Kennedy J.
Glinka D.[4]
6-46-4
R16
Reis Da Silva J.
Draxl L.[1]
6-37-5
Kennedy J.
Crawford O.
7-644-67-5
Zink T.
Krueger M.
6-16-2
Boscardin Dias P.
Rybakov A.
2-67-57-5
Glinka D.[4]
Blanch D.
6-36-4
Tabur C.[5]
Martin A.
6-35-76-3
Barton H.
Johns G.
6-46-4
Mmoh M.
Kingsley C.
4-67-646-4
R32
Reis Da Silva J.
Kicker N.
6-26-3
Crawford O.
Ajdukovic D.
6-36-4
Tabur C.[5]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-13-0
Kennedy J.
Neumayer L.[7]
3-66-44-0
Zink T.
Purtseladze S.
4-67-666-1
Krueger M.
Dutra Da Silva D.
2-66-36-4
Johns G.
Smith C.[6]
7-666-1
Barton H.
Kuzuhara B.
4-66-46-3
Kingsley C.
Popko D.
6-33-67-5
Mmoh M.
Gomez F.[2]
6-26-1
Rybakov A.
Kozlov S.
7-636-2
Glinka D.[4]
Dostanic S.
6-27-63
Martin A.
Langmo C.
6-47-5
Blanch D.
Galan D.
3-66-16-4
Boscardin Dias P.
Olivieri G.[8]
4-66-46-3
Draxl L.[1]
Bigun K.
3-66-26-1