Michael Mmoh vs Federico Agustin Gomez — Tallahassee CH Round of 32

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Michael Mmoh
USA
Michael Mmoh
#192ATP
1613ELO
1508Clay ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 April 2026
clay
ARG2
Federico Agustin Gomez
#212ATP
1445ELO
1410Clay ELO
$29kYTD
$680kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLLLLWL
Mmoh M.
6-2 6-1
Gomez F.
Mmoh M.
662
Gomez F.
210

Michael Mmoh defeated Federico Agustin Gomez 6-2 6-1 in the Tallahassee CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Michael Mmoh came in ranked #192, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mmoh M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gomez F.

Gomez F.serving70% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Serve advantage — Mmoh M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mmoh M.Gomez F.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
44%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Clear edge
65%
52%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.9
5.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.9
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (32 vs 18). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mmoh M.Gomez F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
66
35
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
82
Break points won·Clear edge
31
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
90
58
Tiebreaks·Dominant
77
16

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mmoh M.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Gomez F.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
6.2+98 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.8Clay Elo 1410
7.1Overall Elo 1613
ELO gap
2.9Overall Elo 1445
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
5.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
6.2
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mmoh M.Gomez F.
Freshness·Dominant
93
55

Mmoh M.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Gomez F.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 91 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tabur C.[5]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-41-0
Semi-finals
Reis Da Silva J.
Kennedy J.
6-22-66-4
Tabur C.[5]
Mmoh M.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Tabur C.[5]
Zink T.
6-16-4
Mmoh M.
Barton H.
6-37-65
Reis Da Silva J.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-44-66-4
Kennedy J.
Glinka D.[4]
6-46-4
R16
Reis Da Silva J.
Draxl L.[1]
6-37-5
Kennedy J.
Crawford O.
7-644-67-5
Zink T.
Krueger M.
6-16-2
Boscardin Dias P.
Rybakov A.
2-67-57-5
Glinka D.[4]
Blanch D.
6-36-4
Tabur C.[5]
Martin A.
6-35-76-3
Barton H.
Johns G.
6-46-4
Mmoh M.
Kingsley C.
4-67-646-4
R32
Reis Da Silva J.
Kicker N.
6-26-3
Crawford O.
Ajdukovic D.
6-36-4
Tabur C.[5]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-13-0
Kennedy J.
Neumayer L.[7]
3-66-44-0
Zink T.
Purtseladze S.
4-67-666-1
Krueger M.
Dutra Da Silva D.
2-66-36-4
Johns G.
Smith C.[6]
7-666-1
Barton H.
Kuzuhara B.
4-66-46-3
Kingsley C.
Popko D.
6-33-67-5
Mmoh M.
Gomez F.[2]
6-26-1
Rybakov A.
Kozlov S.
7-636-2
Glinka D.[4]
Dostanic S.
6-27-63
Martin A.
Langmo C.
6-47-5
Blanch D.
Galan D.
3-66-16-4
Boscardin Dias P.
Olivieri G.[8]
4-66-46-3
Draxl L.[1]
Bigun K.
3-66-26-1