Tung Lin Wu vs Taro Daniel — Busan CH Round of 32

Busan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#345ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 April 2026
hard
Taro Daniel
JPN
Taro Daniel
#203ATP
1567ELO
1512Hard ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWW
Wu T.
6-4 6-4
Daniel T.
Wu T.
662
Daniel T.
440

Tung Lin Wu defeated Taro Daniel 6-4 6-4 in the Busan CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Tung Lin Wu edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wu T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Daniel T.serving77% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Serve advantage — Wu T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wu T.Daniel T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
55%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
65%
65%
Aces / match·Even
3.4
3.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.5
1.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (25 vs 25). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wu T.Daniel T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
42
Break points saved·Slight edge
84
93
Break points won·Dominant
6
37
Deciding sets·Slight edge
6
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wu T.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Daniel T.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
4.1Hard Elo 1376
Surface ELO
5.9+136 Hard Elo edge
4.2Overall Elo 1406
ELO gap
5.8Overall Elo 1567
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.4
Surface form
8.1
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.7
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wu T.Daniel T.
Freshness·Clear edge
83
67

Wu T.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 23 games (7d) · Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Riedi L.[8]
Yunchaokete B.[7]
3-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Riedi L.[8]
Broady L.
7-632-3
Yunchaokete B.[7]
Bolt A.[6]
7-56-2
Quarter-finals
Bolt A.[6]
Noguchi R.
7-647-65
Riedi L.[8]
Shimabukuro S.[3]
7-56-1
Yunchaokete B.[7]
Walton A.[2]
6-47-66
Broady L.
Holmgren A.
6-34-66-4
R16
Holmgren A.
Galarneau A.
6-16-4
Broady L.
Ivashka I.
6-16-3
Shimabukuro S.[3]
Zhukayev B.
6-34-67-64
Riedi L.[8]
Kotov P.
7-675-2
Bolt A.[6]
Wu T.
4-66-47-63
Noguchi R.
Wong C.[4]
6-26-2
Yunchaokete B.[7]
Sharipov M.
6-46-2
Walton A.[2]
Trotter J.
6-46-726-3
R32
Shimabukuro S.[3]
Simakin I.
6-36-3
Kotov P.
Zhou Y.
6-12-0
Bolt A.[6]
Mccabe J.
7-57-62
Noguchi R.
Chidekh C.
6-26-2
Yunchaokete B.[7]
Chung Y.
6-16-4
Sharipov M.
Uchiyama Y.
6-35-77-64
Broady L.
Cassone M.
6-06-1
Riedi L.[8]
Kwon S.
7-626-4
Wu T.
Daniel T.
6-46-4
Wong C.[4]
Tokuda R.
7-646-4
Trotter J.
Delaney J.
7-613-66-1
Galarneau A.
Uchida K.
6-47-5
Holmgren A.
Samrej K.
3-66-47-64
Walton A.[2]
Hsu Y.
6-25-76-2
Ivashka I.
Sweeny D.[5]
7-616-746-2
Zhukayev B.
Park U.
4-66-46-4