Anna Bondar vs Harmony Tan — Rouen Round of 32

Rouen · WTA · Round of 32
Anna Bondar
HUN
Anna Bondar
#74WTA
1735ELO
1734Clay ELO
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 13 April 2026
clay
Harmony Tan
FRA
Harmony Tan
#200WTA
1585ELO
1443Clay ELO
28 yrs · 171 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
Bondar A.
6-2 4-6 6-0
Tan H.
Bondar A.
6462
Tan H.
2601

Anna Bondar defeated Harmony Tan 6-2 4-6 6-0 in the Rouen round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Anna Bondar came in ranked #74.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bondar A.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Tan H.

Tan H.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Bondar A.

Serve advantage — Tan H.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Bondar A.Tan H.
54
Serve
—
18
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Bondar A.Tan H.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
54%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Even
41%
45%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.9
2.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.0
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (22 vs 23). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bondar A.Tan H.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
51
39
Break points saved·Clear edge
88
71
Break points won·Even
77
74
Deciding sets·Even
27
23
Tiebreaks·Even
78
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bondar A.
7.5
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Tan H.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.4+291 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.6Clay Elo 1443
7.7Overall Elo 1735
ELO gap
2.3Overall Elo 1585
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.0
Surface form
2.4
Fatigue & Travel
6.5
Minutes 14d
7.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0
5.0
Opponent rise

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bondar A.Tan H.
Freshness·Even
96
100

Bondar A.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Tan H.: 16 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Kostyuk M.[1]
Podrez V.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Podrez V.
Cirstea S.[2]
W/O
Kostyuk M.[1]
Maria T.
6-36-0
Quarter-finals
Kostyuk M.[1]
Li A.[5]
6-06-746-3
Podrez V.
Boulter K.
6-46-1
Maria T.
Shymanovich I.
7-656-2
Cirstea S.[2]
Bondar A.
7-626-2
R16
Cirstea S.[2]
Wang X.
5-3
Kostyuk M.[1]
Mcnally C.
2-66-26-1
Bondar A.
Oliynykova O.
6-04-66-0
Podrez V.
Cocciaretto E.[7]
7-654-66-4
Li A.[5]
Rakhimova K.
4-66-26-3
Shymanovich I.
Baptiste H.[4]
6-35-76-3
Maria T.
Salkova D.
6-36-2
Boulter K.
Cristian J.[3]
7-654-66-1
R32
Cristian J.[3]
Rakotomanga Rajaonah T.
2-67-667-5
Salkova D.
Blinkova A.
7-56-1
Maria T.
Jacquemot E.[9]
6-46-3
Boulter K.
Timofeeva M.
6-26-2
Li A.[5]
Kasatkina D.
6-766-26-4
Mcnally C.
Volynets K.
1-66-16-1
Wang X.
Paquet C.
3-66-46-3
Bondar A.
Tan H.
6-24-66-0
Cocciaretto E.[7]
Charaeva A.
6-34-66-2
Kostyuk M.[1]
Parry D.
6-16-4
Shymanovich I.
Fruhvirtova L.
6-37-5
Podrez V.
Stephens S.
6-26-1
Cirstea S.[2]
Ferro F.
6-36-757-62
Baptiste H.[4]
Ponchet J.
3-67-666-2
Rakhimova K.
Kalieva E.
6-37-61
Oliynykova O.
Tagger L.
6-34-66-4