Michael Mmoh vs Hynek Barton — Tallahassee CH Quarter-final

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Michael Mmoh
USA
Michael Mmoh
#192ATP
1613ELO
1508Clay ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 April 2026
clay
CZE
Hynek Barton
#256ATP
1570ELO
1535Clay ELO
22 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLWW
Mmoh M.
6-3 7-6
Barton H.
Mmoh M.
6772
Barton H.
3650

Michael Mmoh defeated Hynek Barton 6-3 7-6 in the Tallahassee CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Michael Mmoh came in ranked #192, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Michael Mmoh closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mmoh M.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Barton H.

Barton H.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mmoh M.Barton H.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
44%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
63%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.9
6.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.8
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (32 vs 37). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mmoh M.Barton H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
66
38
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
79
Break points won·Dominant
31
6
Deciding sets·Clear edge
90
71
Tiebreaks·Dominant
77
28

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mmoh M.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Barton H.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.3Clay Elo 1508
Surface ELO
3.7+27 Clay Elo edge
7.0Overall Elo 1613
ELO gap
3.0Overall Elo 1570
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
5.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
7.3
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mmoh M.Barton H.
Freshness·Even
93
94

Mmoh M.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Barton H.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Tabur C.[5]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-41-0
Semi-finals
Reis Da Silva J.
Kennedy J.
6-22-66-4
Tabur C.[5]
Mmoh M.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Tabur C.[5]
Zink T.
6-16-4
Mmoh M.
Barton H.
6-37-65
Reis Da Silva J.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-44-66-4
Kennedy J.
Glinka D.[4]
6-46-4
R16
Reis Da Silva J.
Draxl L.[1]
6-37-5
Kennedy J.
Crawford O.
7-644-67-5
Zink T.
Krueger M.
6-16-2
Boscardin Dias P.
Rybakov A.
2-67-57-5
Glinka D.[4]
Blanch D.
6-36-4
Tabur C.[5]
Martin A.
6-35-76-3
Barton H.
Johns G.
6-46-4
Mmoh M.
Kingsley C.
4-67-646-4
R32
Reis Da Silva J.
Kicker N.
6-26-3
Crawford O.
Ajdukovic D.
6-36-4
Tabur C.[5]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-13-0
Kennedy J.
Neumayer L.[7]
3-66-44-0
Zink T.
Purtseladze S.
4-67-666-1
Krueger M.
Dutra Da Silva D.
2-66-36-4
Johns G.
Smith C.[6]
7-666-1
Barton H.
Kuzuhara B.
4-66-46-3
Kingsley C.
Popko D.
6-33-67-5
Mmoh M.
Gomez F.[2]
6-26-1
Rybakov A.
Kozlov S.
7-636-2
Glinka D.[4]
Dostanic S.
6-27-63
Martin A.
Langmo C.
6-47-5
Blanch D.
Galan D.
3-66-16-4
Boscardin Dias P.
Olivieri G.[8]
4-66-46-3
Draxl L.[1]
Bigun K.
3-66-26-1