Luca Van Assche vs Timofey Skatov — Oeiras 3 CH Round of 32

Oeiras 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Luca Van Assche
FRA3
Luca Van Assche
#80ATP
1701ELO
1639Clay ELO
$411kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
22 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 13 April 2026
clay
Timofey Skatov
KAZ
Timofey Skatov
#172ATP
1544ELO
1531Clay ELO
$107kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
25 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLWWLLLWW
Van Assche L.
6-1 6-4
Skatov T.
Van Assche L.
662
Skatov T.
140

Luca Van Assche defeated Timofey Skatov 6-1 6-4 in the Oeiras 3 CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Luca Van Assche came in ranked #80, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Luca Van Assche extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-05-26Roland GarrosQ2clayLuca Van Assche6-7(3) 6-2 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Van Assche L.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Skatov T.

Skatov T.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Van Assche L.

Serve advantage — Van Assche L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Van Assche L.Skatov T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Even
3.0
3.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (35 vs 37). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van Assche L.Skatov T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
67
31
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
81
Break points won·Dominant
61
27
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
31
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
51
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van Assche L.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Skatov T.
3.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
6.3+107 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.7Clay Elo 1531
7.1Overall Elo 1701
ELO gap
2.9Overall Elo 1544
10.0
H2H
0.0
6.1
Surface form
5.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
2.6
Minutes 14d
4.7
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Van Assche L.Skatov T.
Freshness·Clear edge
99
82

Van Assche L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Skatov T.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Safiullin R.
Royer V.[1]
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Royer V.[1]
Houkes M.
6-26-3
Safiullin R.
Rocha H.[7]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Safiullin R.
Faria J.
4-66-37-61
Rocha H.[7]
Llamas Ruiz P.
6-07-5
Royer V.[1]
Schwaerzler J.
7-53-66-3
Houkes M.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-44-67-62
R16
Royer V.[1]
Rodionov J.
3-66-47-5
Schwaerzler J.
Tseng C.
6-16-4
Faria J.
Jarry N.
W/O
Ferreira Silva F.
Echargui M.
6-36-4
Llamas Ruiz P.
Forejtek J.
7-626-756-4
Rocha H.[7]
Sakamoto R.
7-677-64
Houkes M.
Lajovic D.[6]
7-616-4
Safiullin R.
Van Assche L.[3]
7-53-66-2
R32
Echargui M.
Rodesch C.
6-47-64
Safiullin R.
Gill F.
4-67-653-1
Van Assche L.[3]
Skatov T.
6-16-4
Rocha H.[7]
Gentzsch T.
7-637-64
Faria J.
Den Ouden G.
6-716-26-4
Royer V.[1]
Cecchinato M.
6-21-66-4
Rodionov J.
Harris B.
6-21-66-3
Schwaerzler J.
Elias G.
6-33-66-0
Tseng C.
Mcdonald M.[5]
6-17-67
Ferreira Silva F.
Comesana F.[4]
3-66-36-2
Houkes M.
Kolar Z.
6-26-3
Lajovic D.[6]
Bertola R.
6-46-4
Jarry N.
Moller E.[8]
6-23-66-0
Sakamoto R.
Moro Canas A.
6-46-4
Llamas Ruiz P.
Pereira T.
6-26-2
Forejtek J.
Bellucci M.[2]
6-37-5