Li Tu vs Pavle Marinkov — Wuning 1 CH Round of 32

Wuning 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Li Tu
#421ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 April 2026
hard
AUS
Pavle Marinkov
#530ATP
20 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWLW
Tu L.
6-2 6-3
Marinkov P.
Tu L.
662
Marinkov P.
230

Li Tu defeated Pavle Marinkov 6-2 6-3 in the Wuning 1 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tu L.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Marinkov P.

Marinkov P.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tu L.Marinkov P.
1st serve in·Even
60%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
34%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.5
6.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (22 vs 13). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tu L.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Marinkov P.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
5.3
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.4
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kotov P.[8]
Wendelken H.[6]
4-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Kotov P.[8]
Sun F.[5]
7-693-66-3
Wendelken H.[6]
Tu L.
6-26-2
Quarter-finals
Wendelken H.[6]
Chidekh C.[1]
6-46-4
Tu L.
Pearson K.
7-626-4
Sun F.[5]
Boulais J.
6-16-1
Kotov P.[8]
Simakin I.[2]
2-67-656-3
R16
Boulais J.
Uchida K.[4]
6-36-4
Tu L.
Gray A.
6-46-4
Sun F.[5]
Sekulic P.
7-626-3
Chidekh C.[1]
Gadamauri B.
6-46-1
Wendelken H.[6]
Fomin S.
7-56-2
Pearson K.
Zhou Y.[3]
6-46-4
Kotov P.[8]
Holmgren A.
6-47-66
Simakin I.[2]
Ostapenkov D.
6-36-3
R32
Pearson K.
Zhao Z.
6-776-46-4
Sekulic P.
Jones M.
6-26-767-65
Gray A.
Uchiyama Y.[7]
6-34-3
Gadamauri B.
Jasika O.
6-36-3
Zhou Y.[3]
Hussey G.
6-36-4
Chidekh C.[1]
Mochizuki Y.
6-46-1
Uchida K.[4]
Binda A.
6-27-65
Kotov P.[8]
Smith K.
6-46-4
Ostapenkov D.
Sun Q.
7-636-4
Simakin I.[2]
Paris T.
6-736-36-4
Boulais J.
Ellis B.
7-652-2
Holmgren A.
Cui J.
7-637-63
Tu L.
Marinkov P.
6-26-3
Fomin S.
Bouzige M.
6-41-67-63
Wendelken H.[6]
Peliwo F.
6-37-68
Sun F.[5]
Cook E.
7-56-4