Strong Kirchheimer vs Thomas Faurel — Sarasota CH Round of 32

Sarasota CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Strong Kirchheimer
#634ATP
31 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 6 April 2026
clay
FRA
Thomas Faurel
#321ATP
1459ELO
1424Clay ELO
20 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWW
Kirchheimer S.
4-6 7-5 7-6
Faurel T.
Kirchheimer S.
47772
Faurel T.
65621

Strong Kirchheimer defeated Thomas Faurel 4-6 7-5 7-6 in the Sarasota CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kirchheimer S.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Faurel T.

Faurel T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Kirchheimer S.

Serve advantage — Faurel T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kirchheimer S.Faurel T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.6
2.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.4
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (8 vs 14). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kirchheimer S.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Faurel T.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.9
Surface form
3.3
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kirchheimer S.Faurel T.
Freshness·
—
87

Faurel T.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 22 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Wu Y.[1]
Dostanic S.
6-14-66-3
Semi-finals
Wu Y.[1]
Blanch D.
6-37-5
Dostanic S.
Andrade A.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Dostanic S.
Basavareddy N.[8]
5-76-20-0
Wu Y.[1]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-47-64
Blanch D.
Dellien H.[3]
6-17-5
Andrade A.
Glinka D.[6]
6-46-2
R16
Wu Y.[1]
Nishikori K.
6-33-66-1
Blanch D.
Ajdukovic D.
6-16-2
Andrade A.
Zink T.
2-66-47-5
Basavareddy N.[8]
Barton H.
6-17-66
Dostanic S.
Rybakov A.
6-24-66-4
Glinka D.[6]
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-2
Dutra Da Silva D.
Johns G.
6-46-3
Dellien H.[3]
Feldbausch K.
6-15-76-3
R32
Nishikori K.
Kicker N.
6-36-2
Dutra Da Silva D.
Tabur C.[7]
7-57-64
Dellien H.[3]
Olivieri G.
6-27-5
Ajdukovic D.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-46-3
Kirchheimer S.
Faurel T.
4-67-57-62
Andrade A.
Kuzuhara B.
7-684-66-3
Blanch D.
Gomez F.[5]
6-31-1
Feldbausch K.
Kingsley C.
6-37-5
Wu Y.[1]
Bennani R.
6-16-4
Basavareddy N.[8]
Draxl L.
6-37-65
Barton H.
Krueger M.
6-46-4
Dostanic S.
Purtseladze S.
6-26-3
Rybakov A.
Damm M.[2]
3-67-636-3
Glinka D.[6]
Wolf J.
6-37-64
Johns G.
Galan D.
6-27-62
Zink T.
Smith C.[4]
6-11-66-2