Beibit Zhukayev vs Corentin Denolly — Mexico City CH Round of 16

Mexico City CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
KAZ
Beibit Zhukayev
#316ATP
1455ELO
1379Clay ELO
25 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 April 2026
clay
FRA
Corentin Denolly
#423ATP
1331ELO
1293Clay ELO
29 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWLLLLW
Zhukayev B.
7-5 7-6
Denolly C.
Zhukayev B.
7772
Denolly C.
5650

Beibit Zhukayev defeated Corentin Denolly 7-5 7-6 in the Mexico City CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Beibit Zhukayev came in ranked #316, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zhukayev B.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Denolly C.

Denolly C.serving75% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Zhukayev B.

Serve advantage — Zhukayev B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zhukayev B.Denolly C.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
46%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
35%
35%
Break points saved·Even
67%
69%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.4
5.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.9
4.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (22 vs 14). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zhukayev B.Denolly C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
30
50
Break points saved·Clear edge
94
72
Break points won·Clear edge
1
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
24
83
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
63
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zhukayev B.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Denolly C.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.1+86 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.9Clay Elo 1293
6.6Overall Elo 1455
ELO gap
3.4Overall Elo 1331
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.7
Surface form
4.1
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.4
Minutes 14d
8.6
0.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Duckworth J.[1]
Napolitano S.
6-777-636-2
Semi-finals
Napolitano S.
Pavlovic L.[7]
6-36-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Colson T.
7-676-4
Quarter-finals
Napolitano S.
Schoolkate T.[2]
3-66-16-4
Pavlovic L.[7]
Pacheco Mendez R.
2-66-47-61
Colson T.
Hernandez Serrano J.
7-652-67-5
Duckworth J.[1]
Zhukayev B.
4-66-36-4
R16
Zhukayev B.
Denolly C.
7-57-65
Hernandez Serrano J.
Ficovich J.[6]
7-54-66-4
Pavlovic L.[7]
Mayo A.
6-13-67-68
Schoolkate T.[2]
Polmans M.
7-657-5
Pacheco Mendez R.
Artnak B.
6-43-67-5
Duckworth J.[1]
Kozlov S.
6-36-2
Colson T.
Mejia N.[4]
7-56-3
Napolitano S.
Soto M.
6-17-68
R32
Duckworth J.[1]
Mmoh M.
6-46-3
Kozlov S.
Perot R.
6-36-1
Zhukayev B.
Hayen A.
6-16-4
Denolly C.
Huesler M.[8]
1-66-26-1
Pavlovic L.[7]
Mena F.
7-644-66-2
Pacheco Mendez R.
Mcdonald M.[3]
6-26-2
Hernandez Serrano J.
Poling K.
7-56-4
Ficovich J.[6]
Milavsky D.
6-46-3
Artnak B.
Magadan A.
6-34-66-4
Napolitano S.
Martin A.
6-46-4
Polmans M.
Alujas R.
6-16-1
Schoolkate T.[2]
Bicknell B.
7-57-5
Colson T.
Tobon M.
1-66-36-3
Soto M.
Clarke J.[5]
1-66-37-5
Mejia N.[4]
Orlov V.
3-67-636-0
Mayo A.
Martin D.
3-66-37-62