Nishesh Basavareddy vs Hynek Barton — Sarasota CH Round of 16

Sarasota CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA8
Nishesh Basavareddy
#135ATP
1722ELO
1634Clay ELO
$365kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
21 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 6 April 2026
clay
CZE
Hynek Barton
#256ATP
1570ELO
1535Clay ELO
22 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLWW
Basavareddy N.
6-1 7-6
Barton H.
Basavareddy N.
6782
Barton H.
1660

Nishesh Basavareddy defeated Hynek Barton 6-1 7-6 in the Sarasota CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Nishesh Basavareddy came in ranked #135.

Key context

  • Match story: Nishesh Basavareddy came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Basavareddy N.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Barton H.

Barton H.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Basavareddy N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Basavareddy N.Barton H.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.5
5.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.5
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (28 vs 37). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Basavareddy N.Barton H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
76
38
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
79
Break points won·Dominant
49
6
Deciding sets·Clear edge
93
71
Tiebreaks·Dominant
92
28

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Basavareddy N.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Barton H.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.9+99 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.1Clay Elo 1535
8.5Overall Elo 1722
ELO gap
1.5Overall Elo 1570
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.6
Surface form
5.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.3
Minutes 14d
6.3
4.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Basavareddy N.Barton H.
Freshness·
—
93

Barton H.: 4 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Wu Y.[1]
Dostanic S.
6-14-66-3
Semi-finals
Wu Y.[1]
Blanch D.
6-37-5
Dostanic S.
Andrade A.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Dostanic S.
Basavareddy N.[8]
5-76-20-0
Wu Y.[1]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-47-64
Blanch D.
Dellien H.[3]
6-17-5
Andrade A.
Glinka D.[6]
6-46-2
R16
Wu Y.[1]
Nishikori K.
6-33-66-1
Blanch D.
Ajdukovic D.
6-16-2
Andrade A.
Zink T.
2-66-47-5
Basavareddy N.[8]
Barton H.
6-17-66
Dostanic S.
Rybakov A.
6-24-66-4
Glinka D.[6]
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-2
Dutra Da Silva D.
Johns G.
6-46-3
Dellien H.[3]
Feldbausch K.
6-15-76-3
R32
Nishikori K.
Kicker N.
6-36-2
Dutra Da Silva D.
Tabur C.[7]
7-57-64
Dellien H.[3]
Olivieri G.
6-27-5
Ajdukovic D.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
6-46-3
Kirchheimer S.
Faurel T.
4-67-57-62
Andrade A.
Kuzuhara B.
7-684-66-3
Blanch D.
Gomez F.[5]
6-31-1
Feldbausch K.
Kingsley C.
6-37-5
Wu Y.[1]
Bennani R.
6-16-4
Basavareddy N.[8]
Draxl L.
6-37-65
Barton H.
Krueger M.
6-46-4
Dostanic S.
Purtseladze S.
6-26-3
Rybakov A.
Damm M.[2]
3-67-636-3
Glinka D.[6]
Wolf J.
6-37-64
Johns G.
Galan D.
6-27-62
Zink T.
Smith C.[4]
6-11-66-2