Zizou Bergs vs Andrey Rublev — Monte Carlo Masters Round of 32

Monte Carlo Masters · ATP · Round of 32
Zizou Bergs
BEL
Zizou Bergs
#37ATP
1808ELO
1696Clay ELO
$995kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 5 April 2026
clay
Andrey Rublev
RUS13
Andrey Rublev
#13ATP
1902ELO
1872Clay ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
Bergs Z.
6-4 6-1
Rublev A.
Bergs Z.
662
Rublev A.
410

Zizou Bergs defeated Andrey Rublev 6-4 6-1 in the Monte Carlo Masters round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Andrey Rublev came in ranked #13, defending last year's round of 16. Zizou Bergs extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-03-19Miami MastersR64hardZizou Bergs7-5 6-4
2024-02-12RotterdamR32hardAndrey Rublev7-5 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Bergs Z.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Rublev A.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Bergs Z.

Serve advantage — Rublev A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Bergs Z.Rublev A.
—
Serve
14
—
Return
62

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Bergs Z.Rublev A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
66%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
68%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.2
6.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.2
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (24 vs 23). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bergs Z.Rublev A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
69
88
Break points saved·Slight edge
95
100
Break points won·Dominant
21
72
Deciding sets·Slight edge
92
97
Tiebreaks·Even
91
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bergs Z.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Rublev A.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.3Clay Elo 1696
Surface ELO
6.7+176 Clay Elo edge
3.9Overall Elo 1808
ELO gap
6.1Overall Elo 1902
5.0
H2H
5.0
2.1
Surface form
7.6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Country comfort
5.8
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bergs Z.Rublev A.
Freshness·Clear edge
74
94

Bergs Z.: 8 days rest · 4 matches (14d) · Rublev A.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
19°CMainly clear
Wind 8 km/hHumidity 48%
Final
Sinner J.[2]
Alcaraz C.[1]
7-656-3
Semi-finals
Alcaraz C.[1]
Vacherot V.
6-46-4
Sinner J.[2]
Zverev A.[3]
6-16-4
Quarter-finals
Vacherot V.
De Minaur A.[5]
6-43-66-3
Sinner J.[2]
Auger Aliassime F.[6]
6-36-4
Alcaraz C.[1]
Bublik A.[8]
6-36-0
Zverev A.[3]
Fonseca J.
7-56-736-3
R16
Auger Aliassime F.[6]
Ruud C.[9]
7-52-2
De Minaur A.[5]
Blockx A.
7-57-64
Fonseca J.
Berrettini M.
6-36-2
Vacherot V.
Hurkacz H.
6-746-36-4
Zverev A.[3]
Bergs Z.
6-27-5
Bublik A.[8]
Lehecka J.[11]
6-27-5
Alcaraz C.[1]
Etcheverry T.
6-14-66-3
Sinner J.[2]
Machac T.
6-16-736-3
R32
Blockx A.
Cobolli F.[10]
6-36-3
Machac T.
Cerundolo F.[16]
7-626-3
De Minaur A.[5]
Norrie C.
7-652-66-2
Lehecka J.[11]
Tabilo A.
4-67-646-3
Auger Aliassime F.[6]
Cilic M.
7-646-3
Berrettini M.
Medvedev D.[7]
6-06-0
Bergs Z.
Rublev A.[13]
6-46-1
Bublik A.[8]
Monfils G.
6-46-4
Etcheverry T.
Atmane T.
3-66-36-2
Ruud C.[9]
Moutet C.
7-56-3
Hurkacz H.
Marozsan F.
6-26-3
Zverev A.[3]
Garin C.
4-66-47-5
Vacherot V.
Musetti L.[4]
7-667-5
Alcaraz C.[1]
Baez S.
6-16-3
Fonseca J.
Rinderknech A.
7-54-66-3
Sinner J.[2]
Humbert U.
6-36-0
R64
Berrettini M.
Bautista Agut R.
4-0
Rinderknech A.
Khachanov K.[12]
7-56-2
Moutet C.
Muller A.
6-46-1
Tabilo A.
Fucsovics M.
6-46-3
Cilic M.
Shevchenko A.
6-16-3
Hurkacz H.
Darderi L.[15]
7-645-76-1
Marozsan F.
Dzumhur D.
6-26-1
Baez S.
Wawrinka S.
7-57-5
Cobolli F.[10]
Comesana F.
7-52-66-3
Vacherot V.
Cerundolo J.
5-76-26-1
Cerundolo F.[16]
Tsitsipas S.
7-56-4
Fonseca J.
Diallo G.
6-26-3
Humbert U.
Kouame M.
6-37-5
Monfils G.
Griekspoor T.
6-776-16-4
Lehecka J.[11]
Nava E.
7-616-786-2
Ruud C.[9]
Popyrin A.
6-36-4
Rublev A.[13]
Borges N.
6-41-66-1
Norrie C.
Kecmanovic M.
6-24-67-60
Machac T.
Altmaier D.
6-41-66-3
Bergs Z.
Mannarino A.
6-46-3
Atmane T.
Quinn E.
6-16-4
Blockx A.
Shapovalov D.
6-44-66-3
Garin C.
Arnaldi M.
6-26-4
Etcheverry T.
Dimitrov G.
6-42-66-3