Braden Shick vs Ji Sung Nam — Miyazaki CH Round of 32

Miyazaki CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Braden Shick
#325ATP
1385ELO
1358Hard ELO
22 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 March 2026
hard
KOR
Ji Sung Nam
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
Shick B.
6-4 6-2
Nam J.
Shick B.
662
Nam J.
420

Braden Shick defeated Ji Sung Nam 6-4 6-2 in the Miyazaki CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Shick B.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Nam J.

Nam J.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Shick B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Shick B.Nam J.
1st serve in·Even
53%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Even
55%
57%
Aces / match·Even
3.6
4.0
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (15 vs 7). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shick B.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Nam J.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.8
Surface form
3.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Shick B.Nam J.
Freshness·
77
—

Shick B.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 48 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Broady L.
Wendelken H.[7]
3-66-26-2
Semi-finals
Broady L.
Ellis B.
7-626-2
Wendelken H.[7]
Wu T.
6-33-66-3
Quarter-finals
Wu T.
Moriya H.
7-677-61
Wendelken H.[7]
Hsu Y.[3]
6-36-3
Ellis B.
Milic O.
2-62-1
Broady L.
Ilagan A.
6-46-1
R16
Broady L.
Matsuoka H.
6-746-16-2
Milic O.
Zhou Y.[4]
7-56-3
Moriya H.
Trotter J.
7-646-4
Ilagan A.
Oki Y.
6-13-2
Ellis B.
Jones M.
6-41-66-2
Wendelken H.[7]
Shick B.
6-46-4
Hsu Y.[3]
Jasika O.
6-45-76-3
Wu T.
Jubb P.
7-662-67-66
R32
Wendelken H.[7]
Boulais J.
7-57-5
Moriya H.
Matsuda K.
4-66-46-0
Oki Y.
Holmgren A.[1]
4-66-47-64
Matsuoka H.
Samrej K.
7-646-3
Broady L.
Uchida K.[5]
7-636-1
Zhou Y.[4]
Takahashi Y.
6-16-3
Milic O.
Overbeck C.
6-47-64
Ellis B.
Honda N.
2-67-657-63
Jones M.
Sun F.[8]
6-26-1
Jasika O.
Tu L.
7-626-4
Hsu Y.[3]
Tokuda R.
7-56-0
Wu T.
Noguchi R.[6]
6-36-2
Jubb P.
Taguchi R.
4-66-16-4
Ilagan A.
Shimizu Y.
7-56-3
Shick B.
Nam J.
6-46-2
Trotter J.
Added D.[2]
6-46-2