Alex Michelsen vs Coleman Wong — Houston Round of 32

Houston · ATP · Round of 32
Alex Michelsen
USA7
Alex Michelsen
#46ATP
1825ELO
1694Clay ELO
$785kYTD
$4.6MCAREER
21 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 March 2026
clay
HKG
Coleman Wong
#108ATP
1602ELO
1467Clay ELO
$287kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLLW
Michelsen A.
6-4 6-2
Wong C.
Michelsen A.
662
Wong C.
420

Alex Michelsen defeated Coleman Wong 6-4 6-2 in the Houston round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Alex Michelsen came in ranked #46, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Michelsen A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Wong C.

Wong C.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Michelsen A.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Michelsen A.Wong C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
65%
Return points won·Even
35%
36%
Break points saved·Even
67%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.5
10.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (24 vs 37). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Michelsen A.Wong C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
78
42
Break points saved·Slight edge
98
91
Break points won·Dominant
46
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
43
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
95
88

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Michelsen A.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Wong C.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.2+228 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.8Clay Elo 1467
6.6Overall Elo 1825
ELO gap
3.4Overall Elo 1602
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
2.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
5.6
Minutes 14d
6.4
4.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Michelsen A.Wong C.
Freshness·Dominant
61
100

Michelsen A.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 78 games (7d) · Wong C.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Paul T.[4]
Burruchaga R.
6-13-67-5
Semi-finals
Burruchaga R.
Tirante T.
6-16-1
Paul T.[4]
Tiafoe F.[2]
7-54-67-67
Quarter-finals
Burruchaga R.
Tien L.[3]
7-56-4
Tiafoe F.[2]
Popyrin A.
3-66-47-66
Tirante T.
Shelton B.[1]
6-756-36-4
Paul T.[4]
Etcheverry T.[6]
6-46-2
R16
Shelton B.[1]
Zhang Z.
7-657-63
Tirante T.
Mcdonald M.
6-26-0
Paul T.[4]
Vallejo A.
3-66-46-4
Tiafoe F.[2]
Hijikata R.
6-43-66-2
Tien L.[3]
Basavareddy N.
6-33-66-1
Burruchaga R.
Nakashima B.[5]
6-42-66-4
Popyrin A.
Michelsen A.[7]
6-04-66-1
Etcheverry T.[6]
Bolt A.
6-756-06-3
R32
Michelsen A.[7]
Wong C.
6-46-2
Hijikata R.
Kovacevic A.
6-46-2
Etcheverry T.[6]
Gomez F.
1-66-16-4
Vallejo A.
Svajda Z.
6-16-4
Burruchaga R.
Walton A.
6-26-3
Bolt A.
Wu Y.
7-666-2
Zhang Z.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-16-3
Mcdonald M.
Brooksby J.[8]
6-46-2
Nakashima B.[5]
Damm M.
7-606-2
Tirante T.
Smith C.
6-06-3
Basavareddy N.
Draxl L.
6-32-66-4
Popyrin A.
Kypson P.
4-66-46-3