Facundo Mena vs Patrick Zahraj — San Luis Potosi CH Round of 16

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Facundo Mena
ARG
Facundo Mena
#354ATP
1427ELO
1406Clay ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 March 2026
clay
GER
Patrick Zahraj
#401ATP
1331ELO
1259Clay ELO
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
Mena F.
6-2 6-1
Zahraj P.
Mena F.
662
Zahraj P.
210

Facundo Mena defeated Patrick Zahraj 6-2 6-1 in the San Luis Potosi CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mena F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Zahraj P.

Zahraj P.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Mena F.

Serve advantage — Mena F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mena F.Zahraj P.
1st serve in·Even
56%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
44%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
56%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.2
3.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.1
6.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (22 vs 21). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mena F.Zahraj P.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
9
20
Break points saved·Clear edge
57
69
Break points won·Even
7
10
Deciding sets·Clear edge
28
7
Tiebreaks·Dominant
10
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mena F.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Zahraj P.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.6+147 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.4Clay Elo 1259
5.7Overall Elo 1427
ELO gap
4.3Overall Elo 1331
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.7
Surface form
0.9
Fatigue & Travel
4.4
Minutes 14d
7.4
4.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mena F.Zahraj P.
Freshness·Dominant
55
81

Mena F.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 88 games (7d) · Zahraj P.: 4 days rest · 1 match, 32 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Mejia N.[3]
Duckworth J.[1]
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Mejia N.[3]
Schoolkate T.[2]
6-736-27-63
Duckworth J.[1]
Pacheco Mendez R.
4-66-37-67
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[1]
Zhukayev B.
6-26-3
Pacheco Mendez R.
Ficovich J.[4]
3-66-16-4
Mejia N.[3]
Soto M.
7-656-4
Schoolkate T.[2]
Mena F.
2-66-27-62
R16
Mejia N.[3]
Alujas R.
6-06-2
Schoolkate T.[2]
Denolly C.
6-16-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Tobon M.
6-46-3
Zhukayev B.
Martin D.
7-636-766-4
Mena F.
Zahraj P.
6-26-1
Soto M.
Magadan A.
7-632-66-3
Ficovich J.[4]
Marrero Curbelo I.
6-16-4
Pacheco Mendez R.
Pavlovic L.[6]
4-66-36-0
R32
Martin D.
Huesler M.[5]
7-627-65
Zhukayev B.
Catry R.
7-671-66-4
Marrero Curbelo I.
Delaney J.
6-26-4
Pacheco Mendez R.
Colson T.
6-46-2
Mena F.
Napolitano S.[8]
6-46-0
Duckworth J.[1]
Rubio Fierros A.
6-16-1
Ficovich J.[4]
Alves M.
6-06-2
Pavlovic L.[6]
Fenty A.
6-37-63
Denolly C.
Mckennon M.
7-636-3
Schoolkate T.[2]
Ayeni O.
6-7106-36-2
Tobon M.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-16-2
Magadan A.
Kozlov S.[7]
6-37-67
Soto M.
Orlov V.
6-16-2
Alujas R.
Winegar T.
7-647-5
Mejia N.[3]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-36-736-3
Zahraj P.
Wiskandt M.
6-46-4