Tristan Schoolkate vs Facundo Mena — San Luis Potosi CH Quarter-final

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
AUS2
Tristan Schoolkate
#149ATP
1549ELO
1459Clay ELO
$246kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 March 2026
clay
Facundo Mena
ARG
Facundo Mena
#354ATP
1427ELO
1406Clay ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLW
Schoolkate T.
2-6 6-2 7-6
Mena F.
Schoolkate T.
26772
Mena F.
62621

Tristan Schoolkate defeated Facundo Mena 2-6 6-2 7-6 in the San Luis Potosi CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Tristan Schoolkate came in ranked #149.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Schoolkate T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Mena F.

Mena F.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Schoolkate T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Schoolkate T.Mena F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.4
6.8
Double faults / match·Even
3.5
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (30 vs 22). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Schoolkate T.Mena F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
46
9
Break points saved·Dominant
90
57
Break points won·Slight edge
0
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
28
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
33
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Schoolkate T.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Mena F.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.5+53 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Clay Elo 1406
6.6Overall Elo 1549
ELO gap
3.4Overall Elo 1427
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
0.8
Surface form
3.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.4
Minutes 14d
4.4
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Schoolkate T.Mena F.
Freshness·Slight edge
64
55

Schoolkate T.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 66 games (7d) · Mena F.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 88 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Mejia N.[3]
Duckworth J.[1]
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Mejia N.[3]
Schoolkate T.[2]
6-736-27-63
Duckworth J.[1]
Pacheco Mendez R.
4-66-37-67
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[1]
Zhukayev B.
6-26-3
Pacheco Mendez R.
Ficovich J.[4]
3-66-16-4
Mejia N.[3]
Soto M.
7-656-4
Schoolkate T.[2]
Mena F.
2-66-27-62
R16
Mejia N.[3]
Alujas R.
6-06-2
Schoolkate T.[2]
Denolly C.
6-16-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Tobon M.
6-46-3
Zhukayev B.
Martin D.
7-636-766-4
Mena F.
Zahraj P.
6-26-1
Soto M.
Magadan A.
7-632-66-3
Ficovich J.[4]
Marrero Curbelo I.
6-16-4
Pacheco Mendez R.
Pavlovic L.[6]
4-66-36-0
R32
Martin D.
Huesler M.[5]
7-627-65
Zhukayev B.
Catry R.
7-671-66-4
Marrero Curbelo I.
Delaney J.
6-26-4
Pacheco Mendez R.
Colson T.
6-46-2
Mena F.
Napolitano S.[8]
6-46-0
Duckworth J.[1]
Rubio Fierros A.
6-16-1
Ficovich J.[4]
Alves M.
6-06-2
Pavlovic L.[6]
Fenty A.
6-37-63
Denolly C.
Mckennon M.
7-636-3
Schoolkate T.[2]
Ayeni O.
6-7106-36-2
Tobon M.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-16-2
Magadan A.
Kozlov S.[7]
6-37-67
Soto M.
Orlov V.
6-16-2
Alujas R.
Winegar T.
7-647-5
Mejia N.[3]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-36-736-3
Zahraj P.
Wiskandt M.
6-46-4