Facundo Mena vs Stefano Napolitano — San Luis Potosi CH Round of 32

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Facundo Mena
ARG
Facundo Mena
#354ATP
1427ELO
1406Clay ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 March 2026
clay
Stefano Napolitano
ITA8
Stefano Napolitano
#242ATP
1528ELO
1520Clay ELO
31 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLWWWL
Mena F.
6-4 6-0
Napolitano S.
Mena F.
662
Napolitano S.
400

Facundo Mena defeated Stefano Napolitano 6-4 6-0 in the San Luis Potosi CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mena F.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Napolitano S.

Napolitano S.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Mena F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mena F.Napolitano S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
58%
Service points won·Even
63%
67%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
57%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.2
4.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.4
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (22 vs 25). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mena F.Napolitano S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
9
33
Break points saved·Clear edge
57
77
Break points won·Slight edge
7
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
28
55
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
10
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mena F.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Napolitano S.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.2Clay Elo 1406
Surface ELO
6.8+114 Clay Elo edge
3.3Overall Elo 1427
ELO gap
6.7Overall Elo 1528
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.7
Surface form
7.7
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.4
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mena F.Napolitano S.
Freshness·Dominant
61
100

Mena F.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 88 games (7d) · Napolitano S.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Mejia N.[3]
Duckworth J.[1]
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Mejia N.[3]
Schoolkate T.[2]
6-736-27-63
Duckworth J.[1]
Pacheco Mendez R.
4-66-37-67
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[1]
Zhukayev B.
6-26-3
Pacheco Mendez R.
Ficovich J.[4]
3-66-16-4
Mejia N.[3]
Soto M.
7-656-4
Schoolkate T.[2]
Mena F.
2-66-27-62
R16
Mejia N.[3]
Alujas R.
6-06-2
Schoolkate T.[2]
Denolly C.
6-16-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Tobon M.
6-46-3
Zhukayev B.
Martin D.
7-636-766-4
Mena F.
Zahraj P.
6-26-1
Soto M.
Magadan A.
7-632-66-3
Ficovich J.[4]
Marrero Curbelo I.
6-16-4
Pacheco Mendez R.
Pavlovic L.[6]
4-66-36-0
R32
Martin D.
Huesler M.[5]
7-627-65
Zhukayev B.
Catry R.
7-671-66-4
Marrero Curbelo I.
Delaney J.
6-26-4
Pacheco Mendez R.
Colson T.
6-46-2
Mena F.
Napolitano S.[8]
6-46-0
Duckworth J.[1]
Rubio Fierros A.
6-16-1
Ficovich J.[4]
Alves M.
6-06-2
Pavlovic L.[6]
Fenty A.
6-37-63
Denolly C.
Mckennon M.
7-636-3
Schoolkate T.[2]
Ayeni O.
6-7106-36-2
Tobon M.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-16-2
Magadan A.
Kozlov S.[7]
6-37-67
Soto M.
Orlov V.
6-16-2
Alujas R.
Winegar T.
7-647-5
Mejia N.[3]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-36-736-3
Zahraj P.
Wiskandt M.
6-46-4