Nicolas Mejia vs Matias Soto — San Luis Potosi CH Quarter-final

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Nicolas Mejia
COL3
Nicolas Mejia
#165ATP
1477ELO
1488Clay ELO
$142kYTD
$524kCAREER
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 March 2026
clay
CHI
Matias Soto
#296ATP
1421ELO
1412Clay ELO
27 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLWLWLW
Mejia N.
7-6 6-4
Soto M.
Mejia N.
7762
Soto M.
6540

Nicolas Mejia defeated Matias Soto 7-6 6-4 in the San Luis Potosi CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Nicolas Mejia came in ranked #165, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mejia N.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Soto M.

Soto M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Mejia N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mejia N.Soto M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
54%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
41%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Even
4.6
4.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.9
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (30 vs 18). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mejia N.Soto M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
24
34
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
51
Break points won·Slight edge
6
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
36
68
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
38
56

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mejia N.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Soto M.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.8+76 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.2Clay Elo 1412
5.8Overall Elo 1477
ELO gap
4.2Overall Elo 1421
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
9.3
Surface form
10.0
Win streak
10.010-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.7
Minutes 14d
5.2
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mejia N.Soto M.
Freshness·Even
56
55

Mejia N.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 68 games (7d) · Soto M.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 77 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Mejia N.[3]
Duckworth J.[1]
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Mejia N.[3]
Schoolkate T.[2]
6-736-27-63
Duckworth J.[1]
Pacheco Mendez R.
4-66-37-67
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[1]
Zhukayev B.
6-26-3
Pacheco Mendez R.
Ficovich J.[4]
3-66-16-4
Mejia N.[3]
Soto M.
7-656-4
Schoolkate T.[2]
Mena F.
2-66-27-62
R16
Mejia N.[3]
Alujas R.
6-06-2
Schoolkate T.[2]
Denolly C.
6-16-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Tobon M.
6-46-3
Zhukayev B.
Martin D.
7-636-766-4
Mena F.
Zahraj P.
6-26-1
Soto M.
Magadan A.
7-632-66-3
Ficovich J.[4]
Marrero Curbelo I.
6-16-4
Pacheco Mendez R.
Pavlovic L.[6]
4-66-36-0
R32
Martin D.
Huesler M.[5]
7-627-65
Zhukayev B.
Catry R.
7-671-66-4
Marrero Curbelo I.
Delaney J.
6-26-4
Pacheco Mendez R.
Colson T.
6-46-2
Mena F.
Napolitano S.[8]
6-46-0
Duckworth J.[1]
Rubio Fierros A.
6-16-1
Ficovich J.[4]
Alves M.
6-06-2
Pavlovic L.[6]
Fenty A.
6-37-63
Denolly C.
Mckennon M.
7-636-3
Schoolkate T.[2]
Ayeni O.
6-7106-36-2
Tobon M.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-16-2
Magadan A.
Kozlov S.[7]
6-37-67
Soto M.
Orlov V.
6-16-2
Alujas R.
Winegar T.
7-647-5
Mejia N.[3]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-36-736-3
Zahraj P.
Wiskandt M.
6-46-4