Tung Lin Wu vs Paul Jubb — Miyazaki CH Round of 16

Miyazaki CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 March 2026
hard
GBR
Paul Jubb
#338ATP
1426ELO
1403Hard ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWLW
Wu T.
7-6 2-6 7-6
Jubb P.
Wu T.
782782
Jubb P.
666661

Tung Lin Wu defeated Paul Jubb 7-6 2-6 7-6 in the Miyazaki CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Tung Lin Wu closed it out in three sets, 7–6 2–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wu T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Jubb P.

Jubb P.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Serve advantage — Wu T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wu T.Jubb P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
69%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
55%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
58%
Return points won·Even
40%
42%
Break points saved·Clear edge
67%
53%
Aces / match·Even
3.3
3.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.4
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (25 vs 14). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wu T.Jubb P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
37
Break points saved·Even
84
84
Break points won·Even
6
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
6
44
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wu T.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Jubb P.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.0Hard Elo 1376
Surface ELO
5.0+27 Hard Elo edge
5.1Overall Elo 1406
ELO gap
4.9Overall Elo 1426
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.1
Surface form
5.9
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
7.5
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wu T.Jubb P.
Freshness·Clear edge
88
100

Wu T.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Jubb P.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Broady L.
Wendelken H.[7]
3-66-26-2
Semi-finals
Broady L.
Ellis B.
7-626-2
Wendelken H.[7]
Wu T.
6-33-66-3
Quarter-finals
Wu T.
Moriya H.
7-677-61
Wendelken H.[7]
Hsu Y.[3]
6-36-3
Ellis B.
Milic O.
2-62-1
Broady L.
Ilagan A.
6-46-1
R16
Broady L.
Matsuoka H.
6-746-16-2
Milic O.
Zhou Y.[4]
7-56-3
Moriya H.
Trotter J.
7-646-4
Ilagan A.
Oki Y.
6-13-2
Ellis B.
Jones M.
6-41-66-2
Wendelken H.[7]
Shick B.
6-46-4
Hsu Y.[3]
Jasika O.
6-45-76-3
Wu T.
Jubb P.
7-662-67-66
R32
Wendelken H.[7]
Boulais J.
7-57-5
Moriya H.
Matsuda K.
4-66-46-0
Oki Y.
Holmgren A.[1]
4-66-47-64
Matsuoka H.
Samrej K.
7-646-3
Broady L.
Uchida K.[5]
7-636-1
Zhou Y.[4]
Takahashi Y.
6-16-3
Milic O.
Overbeck C.
6-47-64
Ellis B.
Honda N.
2-67-657-63
Jones M.
Sun F.[8]
6-26-1
Jasika O.
Tu L.
7-626-4
Hsu Y.[3]
Tokuda R.
7-56-0
Wu T.
Noguchi R.[6]
6-36-2
Jubb P.
Taguchi R.
4-66-16-4
Ilagan A.
Shimizu Y.
7-56-3
Shick B.
Nam J.
6-46-2
Trotter J.
Added D.[2]
6-46-2