Paul Jubb vs Ryotaro Taguchi — Miyazaki CH Round of 32

Miyazaki CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GBR
Paul Jubb
#331ATP
1426ELO
1403Hard ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 March 2026
hard
JPN
Ryotaro Taguchi
#947ATP
26 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWLW
Jubb P.
4-6 6-1 6-4
Taguchi R.
Jubb P.
4662
Taguchi R.
6141

Paul Jubb defeated Ryotaro Taguchi 4-6 6-1 6-4 in the Miyazaki CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jubb P.serving75% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Taguchi R.

Taguchi R.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Jubb P.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jubb P.Taguchi R.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
74%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
57%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
43%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
51%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.6
6.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.1
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (14 vs 7). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jubb P.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Taguchi R.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 84 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.9
Surface form
5.1
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jubb P.Taguchi R.
Freshness·
100
—

Jubb P.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Broady L.
Wendelken H.[7]
3-66-26-2
Semi-finals
Broady L.
Ellis B.
7-626-2
Wendelken H.[7]
Wu T.
6-33-66-3
Quarter-finals
Wu T.
Moriya H.
7-677-61
Wendelken H.[7]
Hsu Y.[3]
6-36-3
Ellis B.
Milic O.
2-62-1
Broady L.
Ilagan A.
6-46-1
R16
Broady L.
Matsuoka H.
6-746-16-2
Milic O.
Zhou Y.[4]
7-56-3
Moriya H.
Trotter J.
7-646-4
Ilagan A.
Oki Y.
6-13-2
Ellis B.
Jones M.
6-41-66-2
Wendelken H.[7]
Shick B.
6-46-4
Hsu Y.[3]
Jasika O.
6-45-76-3
Wu T.
Jubb P.
7-662-67-66
R32
Wendelken H.[7]
Boulais J.
7-57-5
Moriya H.
Matsuda K.
4-66-46-0
Oki Y.
Holmgren A.[1]
4-66-47-64
Matsuoka H.
Samrej K.
7-646-3
Broady L.
Uchida K.[5]
7-636-1
Zhou Y.[4]
Takahashi Y.
6-16-3
Milic O.
Overbeck C.
6-47-64
Ellis B.
Honda N.
2-67-657-63
Jones M.
Sun F.[8]
6-26-1
Jasika O.
Tu L.
7-626-4
Hsu Y.[3]
Tokuda R.
7-56-0
Wu T.
Noguchi R.[6]
6-36-2
Jubb P.
Taguchi R.
4-66-16-4
Ilagan A.
Shimizu Y.
7-56-3
Shick B.
Nam J.
6-46-2
Trotter J.
Added D.[2]
6-46-2