Omar Jasika vs Li Tu — Miyazaki CH Round of 32

Miyazaki CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Omar Jasika
#531ATP
1296ELO
1272Hard ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 March 2026
hard
AUS
Li Tu
#421ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Jasika O.
7-6 6-4
Tu L.
Jasika O.
7762
Tu L.
6240

Omar Jasika defeated Li Tu 7-6 6-4 in the Miyazaki CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jasika O.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Tu L.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Jasika O.

Serve advantage — Tu L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jasika O.Tu L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
66%
Return points won·Even
35%
36%
Break points saved·Even
55%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.9
8.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (20 vs 22). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jasika O.Tu L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
27
Break points saved·Dominant
47
82
Break points won·Slight edge
13
8
Deciding sets·Slight edge
12
20
Tiebreaks·Dominant
1
64

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jasika O.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Tu L.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.6Hard Elo 1272
Surface ELO
7.4+199 Hard Elo edge
2.4Overall Elo 1296
ELO gap
7.6Overall Elo 1488
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.1
Surface form
5.7
Fatigue & Travel
7.9
Minutes 14d
7.7
4.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Broady L.
Wendelken H.[7]
3-66-26-2
Semi-finals
Broady L.
Ellis B.
7-626-2
Wendelken H.[7]
Wu T.
6-33-66-3
Quarter-finals
Wu T.
Moriya H.
7-677-61
Wendelken H.[7]
Hsu Y.[3]
6-36-3
Ellis B.
Milic O.
2-62-1
Broady L.
Ilagan A.
6-46-1
R16
Broady L.
Matsuoka H.
6-746-16-2
Milic O.
Zhou Y.[4]
7-56-3
Moriya H.
Trotter J.
7-646-4
Ilagan A.
Oki Y.
6-13-2
Ellis B.
Jones M.
6-41-66-2
Wendelken H.[7]
Shick B.
6-46-4
Hsu Y.[3]
Jasika O.
6-45-76-3
Wu T.
Jubb P.
7-662-67-66
R32
Wendelken H.[7]
Boulais J.
7-57-5
Moriya H.
Matsuda K.
4-66-46-0
Oki Y.
Holmgren A.[1]
4-66-47-64
Matsuoka H.
Samrej K.
7-646-3
Broady L.
Uchida K.[5]
7-636-1
Zhou Y.[4]
Takahashi Y.
6-16-3
Milic O.
Overbeck C.
6-47-64
Ellis B.
Honda N.
2-67-657-63
Jones M.
Sun F.[8]
6-26-1
Jasika O.
Tu L.
7-626-4
Hsu Y.[3]
Tokuda R.
7-56-0
Wu T.
Noguchi R.[6]
6-36-2
Jubb P.
Taguchi R.
4-66-16-4
Ilagan A.
Shimizu Y.
7-56-3
Shick B.
Nam J.
6-46-2
Trotter J.
Added D.[2]
6-46-2