James Duckworth vs Beibit Zhukayev — San Luis Potosi CH Quarter-final

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
James Duckworth
AUS1
James Duckworth
#79ATP
1628ELO
1573Clay ELO
$485kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
34 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 March 2026
clay
KAZ
Beibit Zhukayev
#316ATP
1455ELO
1379Clay ELO
25 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWWW
Duckworth J.
6-2 6-3
Zhukayev B.
Duckworth J.
662
Zhukayev B.
230

James Duckworth defeated Beibit Zhukayev 6-2 6-3 in the San Luis Potosi CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — James Duckworth came in ranked #79, defending the title.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Duckworth J.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Zhukayev B.

Zhukayev B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Duckworth J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Duckworth J.Zhukayev B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
34%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
73%
68%
Aces / match·Slight edge
8.7
9.7
Double faults / match·Even
3.8
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (25 vs 22). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Duckworth J.Zhukayev B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
54
31
Break points saved·Even
97
94
Break points won·Even
4
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
77
25
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
72
63

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Duckworth J.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Zhukayev B.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.6+194 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.4Clay Elo 1379
7.5Overall Elo 1628
ELO gap
2.5Overall Elo 1455
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
5.2
Surface form
3.9
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
8.6
4.0
3-set count
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Duckworth J.Zhukayev B.
Freshness·
80
—

Duckworth J.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 42 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Mejia N.[3]
Duckworth J.[1]
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Mejia N.[3]
Schoolkate T.[2]
6-736-27-63
Duckworth J.[1]
Pacheco Mendez R.
4-66-37-67
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[1]
Zhukayev B.
6-26-3
Pacheco Mendez R.
Ficovich J.[4]
3-66-16-4
Mejia N.[3]
Soto M.
7-656-4
Schoolkate T.[2]
Mena F.
2-66-27-62
R16
Mejia N.[3]
Alujas R.
6-06-2
Schoolkate T.[2]
Denolly C.
6-16-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Tobon M.
6-46-3
Zhukayev B.
Martin D.
7-636-766-4
Mena F.
Zahraj P.
6-26-1
Soto M.
Magadan A.
7-632-66-3
Ficovich J.[4]
Marrero Curbelo I.
6-16-4
Pacheco Mendez R.
Pavlovic L.[6]
4-66-36-0
R32
Martin D.
Huesler M.[5]
7-627-65
Zhukayev B.
Catry R.
7-671-66-4
Marrero Curbelo I.
Delaney J.
6-26-4
Pacheco Mendez R.
Colson T.
6-46-2
Mena F.
Napolitano S.[8]
6-46-0
Duckworth J.[1]
Rubio Fierros A.
6-16-1
Ficovich J.[4]
Alves M.
6-06-2
Pavlovic L.[6]
Fenty A.
6-37-63
Denolly C.
Mckennon M.
7-636-3
Schoolkate T.[2]
Ayeni O.
6-7106-36-2
Tobon M.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-16-2
Magadan A.
Kozlov S.[7]
6-37-67
Soto M.
Orlov V.
6-16-2
Alujas R.
Winegar T.
7-647-5
Mejia N.[3]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-36-736-3
Zahraj P.
Wiskandt M.
6-46-4