Corentin Denolly vs Maxwell Mckennon — San Luis Potosi CH Round of 32

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA
Corentin Denolly
#423ATP
1331ELO
1293Clay ELO
29 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 March 2026
clay
USA
Maxwell Mckennon
#553ATP
24 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWWWL
Denolly C.
7-6 6-3
Mckennon M.
Denolly C.
7762
Mckennon M.
6330

Corentin Denolly defeated Maxwell Mckennon 7-6 6-3 in the San Luis Potosi CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Denolly C.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Mckennon M.

Mckennon M.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Denolly C.

Serve advantage — Mckennon M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Denolly C.Mckennon M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
45%
52%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
68%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.2
4.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.6
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (14 vs 9). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Denolly C.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Mckennon M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
5.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.3
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Mejia N.[3]
Duckworth J.[1]
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Mejia N.[3]
Schoolkate T.[2]
6-736-27-63
Duckworth J.[1]
Pacheco Mendez R.
4-66-37-67
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[1]
Zhukayev B.
6-26-3
Pacheco Mendez R.
Ficovich J.[4]
3-66-16-4
Mejia N.[3]
Soto M.
7-656-4
Schoolkate T.[2]
Mena F.
2-66-27-62
R16
Mejia N.[3]
Alujas R.
6-06-2
Schoolkate T.[2]
Denolly C.
6-16-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Tobon M.
6-46-3
Zhukayev B.
Martin D.
7-636-766-4
Mena F.
Zahraj P.
6-26-1
Soto M.
Magadan A.
7-632-66-3
Ficovich J.[4]
Marrero Curbelo I.
6-16-4
Pacheco Mendez R.
Pavlovic L.[6]
4-66-36-0
R32
Martin D.
Huesler M.[5]
7-627-65
Zhukayev B.
Catry R.
7-671-66-4
Marrero Curbelo I.
Delaney J.
6-26-4
Pacheco Mendez R.
Colson T.
6-46-2
Mena F.
Napolitano S.[8]
6-46-0
Duckworth J.[1]
Rubio Fierros A.
6-16-1
Ficovich J.[4]
Alves M.
6-06-2
Pavlovic L.[6]
Fenty A.
6-37-63
Denolly C.
Mckennon M.
7-636-3
Schoolkate T.[2]
Ayeni O.
6-7106-36-2
Tobon M.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-16-2
Magadan A.
Kozlov S.[7]
6-37-67
Soto M.
Orlov V.
6-16-2
Alujas R.
Winegar T.
7-647-5
Mejia N.[3]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-36-736-3
Zahraj P.
Wiskandt M.
6-46-4