Ivan Marrero Curbelo vs Thijmen Loof — San Luis Potosi CH Qualifying Round 2

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
ESP3
Ivan Marrero Curbelo
#376ATP
1303ELO
1328Clay ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 March 2026
clay
NED
Thijmen Loof
#1479ATP
23 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
Marrero Curbelo I.
5-7 6-3 7-5
Loof T.
Marrero Curbelo I.
5672
Loof T.
7351

Ivan Marrero Curbelo defeated Thijmen Loof 5-7 6-3 7-5 in the San Luis Potosi CH qualifying round 2 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Marrero Curbelo I.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Loof T.

Loof T.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Marrero Curbelo I.

Serve advantage — Loof T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. Small sample — read as indicative. About

Statistics

This season
Marrero Curbelo I.Loof T.
1st serve in·Clear edge
64%
43%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
63%
85%
2nd serve points won·Clear edge
51%
67%
Service points won·Clear edge
59%
75%
Return points won·Even
43%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
50%
Aces / match·Dominant
0.9
7.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.2
0.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (20 vs 1). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Marrero Curbelo I.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Loof T.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 133 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Colson T.[2]
Covato M.[10]
6-26-1
Ayeni O.[6]
Dalmasso G.[9]
4-66-46-3
Mckennon M.[4]
Heredia S.[11]
6-13-66-3
Tobon M.[5]
Poling K.[7]
6-716-27-66
Winegar T.
Gonzalez Fernandez M.[8]
5-76-46-2
Marrero Curbelo I.[3]
Loof T.
5-76-37-5
Q1
Winegar T.
De Alba R.
6-36-2
Marrero Curbelo I.[3]
Kumar P.
6-16-1
Loof T.
Linde Palacios S.[12]
7-626-4
Gonzalez Fernandez M.[8]
Reyes Tirado O.
6-26-0
Colson T.[2]
Sau Franco A.
2-66-06-3
Heredia S.[11]
Brown P.
6-46-1
Tobon M.[5]
Alvarado P.
6-26-3
Poling K.[7]
Tunas G.
6-36-0
Dalmasso G.[9]
Voelzke G.
6-13-66-3
Mckennon M.[4]
Zeballos F.
6-36-1