Ivan Marrero Curbelo vs Pranav Kumar — San Luis Potosi CH Qualifying Round 1

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
ESP3
Ivan Marrero Curbelo
#376ATP
1303ELO
1328Clay ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 March 2026
clay
USA
Pranav Kumar
#1777ATP
26 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
Marrero Curbelo I.
6-1 6-1
Kumar P.
Marrero Curbelo I.
662
Kumar P.
110

Ivan Marrero Curbelo defeated Pranav Kumar 6-1 6-1 in the San Luis Potosi CH qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Marrero Curbelo I.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Kumar P.

Kumar P.serving47% hold

wins 49% of points on serve vs Marrero Curbelo I.

Serve advantage — Marrero Curbelo I.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Marrero Curbelo I.Kumar P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
53%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
62%
2nd serve points won·Clear edge
52%
34%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
49%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
47%
Aces / match·Slight edge
0.9
1.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.4
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (20 vs 4). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Marrero Curbelo I.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kumar P.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
Win streak
0.0Lost last 12
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
8.7
4.0
3-set count
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Colson T.[2]
Covato M.[10]
6-26-1
Ayeni O.[6]
Dalmasso G.[9]
4-66-46-3
Mckennon M.[4]
Heredia S.[11]
6-13-66-3
Tobon M.[5]
Poling K.[7]
6-716-27-66
Winegar T.
Gonzalez Fernandez M.[8]
5-76-46-2
Marrero Curbelo I.[3]
Loof T.
5-76-37-5
Q1
Winegar T.
De Alba R.
6-36-2
Marrero Curbelo I.[3]
Kumar P.
6-16-1
Loof T.
Linde Palacios S.[12]
7-626-4
Gonzalez Fernandez M.[8]
Reyes Tirado O.
6-26-0
Colson T.[2]
Sau Franco A.
2-66-06-3
Heredia S.[11]
Brown P.
6-46-1
Tobon M.[5]
Alvarado P.
6-26-3
Poling K.[7]
Tunas G.
6-36-0
Dalmasso G.[9]
Voelzke G.
6-13-66-3
Mckennon M.[4]
Zeballos F.
6-36-1