Ivan Marrero Curbelo vs Jake Delaney — San Luis Potosi CH Round of 32

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ESP
Ivan Marrero Curbelo
#374ATP
1303ELO
1328Clay ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 March 2026
clay
AUS
Jake Delaney
#383ATP
1103ELO
1132Clay ELO
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLLW
Marrero Curbelo I.
6-2 6-4
Delaney J.
Marrero Curbelo I.
662
Delaney J.
240

Ivan Marrero Curbelo defeated Jake Delaney 6-2 6-4 in the San Luis Potosi CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Marrero Curbelo I.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Delaney J.

Delaney J.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Marrero Curbelo I.

Serve advantage — Marrero Curbelo I.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Marrero Curbelo I.Delaney J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
43%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.0
5.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (20 vs 19). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Marrero Curbelo I.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Delaney J.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
5.6
4.0
3-set count
0.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Mejia N.[3]
Duckworth J.[1]
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Mejia N.[3]
Schoolkate T.[2]
6-736-27-63
Duckworth J.[1]
Pacheco Mendez R.
4-66-37-67
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[1]
Zhukayev B.
6-26-3
Pacheco Mendez R.
Ficovich J.[4]
3-66-16-4
Mejia N.[3]
Soto M.
7-656-4
Schoolkate T.[2]
Mena F.
2-66-27-62
R16
Mejia N.[3]
Alujas R.
6-06-2
Schoolkate T.[2]
Denolly C.
6-16-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Tobon M.
6-46-3
Zhukayev B.
Martin D.
7-636-766-4
Mena F.
Zahraj P.
6-26-1
Soto M.
Magadan A.
7-632-66-3
Ficovich J.[4]
Marrero Curbelo I.
6-16-4
Pacheco Mendez R.
Pavlovic L.[6]
4-66-36-0
R32
Martin D.
Huesler M.[5]
7-627-65
Zhukayev B.
Catry R.
7-671-66-4
Marrero Curbelo I.
Delaney J.
6-26-4
Pacheco Mendez R.
Colson T.
6-46-2
Mena F.
Napolitano S.[8]
6-46-0
Duckworth J.[1]
Rubio Fierros A.
6-16-1
Ficovich J.[4]
Alves M.
6-06-2
Pavlovic L.[6]
Fenty A.
6-37-63
Denolly C.
Mckennon M.
7-636-3
Schoolkate T.[2]
Ayeni O.
6-7106-36-2
Tobon M.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-16-2
Magadan A.
Kozlov S.[7]
6-37-67
Soto M.
Orlov V.
6-16-2
Alujas R.
Winegar T.
7-647-5
Mejia N.[3]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-36-736-3
Zahraj P.
Wiskandt M.
6-46-4