Rodrigo Alujas vs Theodore Winegar — San Luis Potosi CH Round of 32

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
MEX
Rodrigo Alujas
#777ATP
23 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 March 2026
clay
USA
Theodore Winegar
#1471ATP
25 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWW
Alujas R.
7-6 7-5
Winegar T.
Alujas R.
7772
Winegar T.
6450

Rodrigo Alujas defeated Theodore Winegar 7-6 7-5 in the San Luis Potosi CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Rodrigo Alujas came in ranked #777, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Alujas R.serving60% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Winegar T.

Winegar T.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Alujas R.

Serve advantage — Winegar T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Alujas R.Winegar T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
56%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
62%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
42%
44%
Service points won·Slight edge
55%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
41%
Break points saved·Even
45%
43%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.5
8.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.3
9.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (4 vs 3). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Alujas R.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Winegar T.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Alujas R.Winegar T.
Freshness·
99
—

Alujas R.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Mejia N.[3]
Duckworth J.[1]
7-666-2
Semi-finals
Mejia N.[3]
Schoolkate T.[2]
6-736-27-63
Duckworth J.[1]
Pacheco Mendez R.
4-66-37-67
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[1]
Zhukayev B.
6-26-3
Pacheco Mendez R.
Ficovich J.[4]
3-66-16-4
Mejia N.[3]
Soto M.
7-656-4
Schoolkate T.[2]
Mena F.
2-66-27-62
R16
Mejia N.[3]
Alujas R.
6-06-2
Schoolkate T.[2]
Denolly C.
6-16-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Tobon M.
6-46-3
Zhukayev B.
Martin D.
7-636-766-4
Mena F.
Zahraj P.
6-26-1
Soto M.
Magadan A.
7-632-66-3
Ficovich J.[4]
Marrero Curbelo I.
6-16-4
Pacheco Mendez R.
Pavlovic L.[6]
4-66-36-0
R32
Martin D.
Huesler M.[5]
7-627-65
Zhukayev B.
Catry R.
7-671-66-4
Marrero Curbelo I.
Delaney J.
6-26-4
Pacheco Mendez R.
Colson T.
6-46-2
Mena F.
Napolitano S.[8]
6-46-0
Duckworth J.[1]
Rubio Fierros A.
6-16-1
Ficovich J.[4]
Alves M.
6-06-2
Pavlovic L.[6]
Fenty A.
6-37-63
Denolly C.
Mckennon M.
7-636-3
Schoolkate T.[2]
Ayeni O.
6-7106-36-2
Tobon M.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-16-2
Magadan A.
Kozlov S.[7]
6-37-67
Soto M.
Orlov V.
6-16-2
Alujas R.
Winegar T.
7-647-5
Mejia N.[3]
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-36-736-3
Zahraj P.
Wiskandt M.
6-46-4