Theodore Winegar vs Rafael De Alba — San Luis Potosi CH Qualifying Round 1

San Luis Potosi CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
USA
Theodore Winegar
#1471ATP
25 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 March 2026
clay
MEX
Rafael De Alba
#1129ATP
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
Winegar T.
6-3 6-2
De Alba R.
Winegar T.
662
De Alba R.
320

Theodore Winegar defeated Rafael De Alba 6-3 6-2 in the San Luis Potosi CH qualifying round 1 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Rafael De Alba came in ranked #1129, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Winegar T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs De Alba R.

De Alba R.serving58% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Winegar T.

Serve advantage — Winegar T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Winegar T.De Alba R.
1st serve in·Even
54%
57%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
73%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
39%
40%
Service points won·Slight edge
57%
52%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
29%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.3
2.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
12.0
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (3 vs 6). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Winegar T.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
De Alba R.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
4.6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 10
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.4
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Colson T.[2]
Covato M.[10]
6-26-1
Ayeni O.[6]
Dalmasso G.[9]
4-66-46-3
Mckennon M.[4]
Heredia S.[11]
6-13-66-3
Tobon M.[5]
Poling K.[7]
6-716-27-66
Winegar T.
Gonzalez Fernandez M.[8]
5-76-46-2
Marrero Curbelo I.[3]
Loof T.
5-76-37-5
Q1
Winegar T.
De Alba R.
6-36-2
Marrero Curbelo I.[3]
Kumar P.
6-16-1
Loof T.
Linde Palacios S.[12]
7-626-4
Gonzalez Fernandez M.[8]
Reyes Tirado O.
6-26-0
Colson T.[2]
Sau Franco A.
2-66-06-3
Heredia S.[11]
Brown P.
6-46-1
Tobon M.[5]
Alvarado P.
6-26-3
Poling K.[7]
Tunas G.
6-36-0
Dalmasso G.[9]
Voelzke G.
6-13-66-3
Mckennon M.[4]
Zeballos F.
6-36-1