Chris Rodesch vs Marc Polmans — Morelia CH Round of 16

Morelia CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
LUX6
Chris Rodesch
#173ATP
1622ELO
1623Hard ELO
$163kYTD
$424kCAREER
24 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 March 2026
hard
Marc Polmans
AUS
Marc Polmans
#344ATP
1449ELO
1414Hard ELO
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWLWL
Rodesch C.
6-4 6-4
Polmans M.
Rodesch C.
662
Polmans M.
440

Chris Rodesch defeated Marc Polmans 6-4 6-4 in the Morelia CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Chris Rodesch edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rodesch C.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Polmans M.

Polmans M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Rodesch C.

Serve advantage — Rodesch C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rodesch C.Polmans M.
1st serve in·Even
67%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
67%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
63%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.0
4.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (26 vs 16). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rodesch C.Polmans M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
52
23
Break points saved·Slight edge
87
79
Break points won·Slight edge
5
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
81
31
Tiebreaks·Dominant
74
24

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rodesch C.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Polmans M.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.8+209 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.2Hard Elo 1414
7.6Overall Elo 1622
ELO gap
2.4Overall Elo 1449
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
3.5
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
7.1
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Rodesch C.Polmans M.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Rodesch C.: 17 days rest · Polmans M.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Gojo B.[8]
Ficovich J.
7-656-2
Semi-finals
Gojo B.[8]
Mejia N.
6-47-65
Ficovich J.
Pavlovic L.
6-13-66-3
Quarter-finals
Mejia N.
Rodesch C.[6]
4-0
Gojo B.[8]
Pacheco Mendez R.
7-636-4
Ficovich J.
Schoolkate T.[3]
6-37-5
Pavlovic L.
Galarneau A.
7-654-67-65
R16
Ficovich J.
Mochizuki S.[5]
6-736-46-1
Pacheco Mendez R.
Duckworth J.[1]
7-646-3
Gojo B.[8]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-36-767-5
Mejia N.
Martin A.
6-46-4
Rodesch C.[6]
Polmans M.
6-46-4
Schoolkate T.[3]
Andrade A.
6-46-0
Galarneau A.
Yunchaokete B.[7]
7-606-4
Pavlovic L.
Magadan A.
6-46-3
R32
Gojo B.[8]
Krueger M.
7-656-4
Mejia N.
Wong C.[4]
7-57-62
Polmans M.
Mena F.
6-33-67-65
Mochizuki S.[5]
Smith K.
3-66-36-4
Schoolkate T.[3]
Catry R.
7-626-4
Galarneau A.
Tobon M.
7-642-66-3
Yunchaokete B.[7]
Wiskandt M.
7-56-4
Ficovich J.
Alves M.
6-36-1
Andrade A.
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-46-4
Vandecasteele Q.
Zhukayev B.
6-17-64
Pavlovic L.
Walton A.[2]
6-37-5
Martin A.
Kozlov S.
6-26-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Huesler M.
5-76-46-4
Pacheco Mendez R.
Ayeni O.
6-26-4
Rodesch C.[6]
Crawford O.
6-36-3
Magadan A.
Rubio Fierros A.
6-36-2