Jakub Paul vs John Sperle — Naples CH Qualifying Round 2

Naples CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
SUI
Jakub Paul
#543ATP
1389ELO
1348Clay ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 March 2026
clay
GER
John Sperle
#833ATP
24 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWLLW
Paul J.
5-7 7-6 6-2
Sperle J.
Paul J.
57762
Sperle J.
76221

Jakub Paul defeated John Sperle 5-7 7-6 6-2 in the Naples CH qualifying round 2 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Paul J.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Sperle J.

Sperle J.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Paul J.

Serve advantage — Sperle J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Paul J.Sperle J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
54%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
47%
Aces / match·Even
2.2
2.5
Double faults / match·Even
0.6
0.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (9 vs 6). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Paul J.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Sperle J.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
5.9
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
7.04-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.4
3-set count
0.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Paul J.Sperle J.
Freshness·
—
96

Sperle J.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Paul J.
Sperle J.
5-77-626-2
Dalla Valle E.[12]
Jorda Sanchis D.[4]
6-36-3
Bondioli F.[9]
Guerrieri A.[6]
6-27-66
Forti F.
Carboni L.
4-66-36-4
Barton H.[2]
Rottoli L.
6-16-3
Ribecai M.[5]
Tammaro M.
6-06-1
Q1
Carboni L.
Piros Z.[1]
6-43-67-64
Forti F.
Chepelev A.[7]
4-66-26-3
Barton H.[2]
Mcdonald N.
6-46-2
Rottoli L.
Potenza L.[8]
5-76-46-4
Sperle J.
Arnaboldi F.[3]
6-46-726-2
Ribecai M.[5]
Raquillet L.
6-16-4
Tammaro M.
Ferrari G.[11]
2-66-46-2
Bondioli F.[9]
Ciocca G.
6-26-0
Paul J.
Lokoli L.[10]
6-26-2
Jorda Sanchis D.[4]
Catini N.
6-12-0
Dalla Valle E.[12]
Osti F.
6-26-2
Guerrieri A.[6]
Bilardo J.
6-36-1