Li Tu vs Carl Emil Overbeck — Yokkaichi CH Round of 32

Yokkaichi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 March 2026
hard
DEN
Carl Emil Overbeck
#345ATP
1293ELO
1271Hard ELO
24 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWWWW
Tu L.
7-5 7-6
Overbeck C.
Tu L.
7772
Overbeck C.
5630

Li Tu defeated Carl Emil Overbeck 7-5 7-6 in the Yokkaichi CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tu L.serving88% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Overbeck C.

Overbeck C.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tu L.Overbeck C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
69%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
65%
Return points won·Even
36%
35%
Break points saved·Even
58%
55%
Aces / match·Even
7.9
7.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (22 vs 13). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tu L.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Overbeck C.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 70 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
7.7+200 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.3Hard Elo 1271
7.9Overall Elo 1488
ELO gap
2.1Overall Elo 1293
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
8.0
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Noguchi R.[7]
Uchiyama Y.
5-77-656-3
Semi-finals
Noguchi R.[7]
Wendelken H.
6-42-66-4
Uchiyama Y.
Matsuoka H.
6-45-76-4
Quarter-finals
Matsuoka H.
Kwon S.
4-66-24-2
Noguchi R.[7]
Broady L.
6-16-3
Uchiyama Y.
Sun F.
6-16-2
Wendelken H.
Shimizu Y.
6-36-4
R16
Uchiyama Y.
Added D.[3]
6-26-2
Matsuoka H.
Mccabe J.[8]
7-56-4
Broady L.
Honda N.
6-16-1
Shimizu Y.
Hsu Y.[4]
7-53-66-1
Wendelken H.
Jubb P.
6-24-67-64
Sun F.
Imamura M.
3-66-36-4
Kwon S.
Holmgren A.[2]
7-56-3
Noguchi R.[7]
Tu L.
4-66-07-5
R32
Hsu Y.[4]
Boulais J.
7-56-3
Noguchi R.[7]
Wu T.
6-36-3
Honda N.
Shimabukuro S.[1]
6-16-4
Broady L.
Trotter J.
6-16-1
Tu L.
Overbeck C.
7-57-63
Shimizu Y.
Cui J.
2-66-06-4
Jubb P.
Samrej K.
7-56-0
Wendelken H.
Zhou Y.[5]
6-14-66-1
Uchiyama Y.
Jones M.
6-44-66-4
Added D.[3]
Isomura K.
6-46-2
Mccabe J.[8]
Ilagan A.
6-47-69
Matsuoka H.
Milic O.
6-45-76-4
Kwon S.
Ellis B.
6-26-0
Holmgren A.[2]
Tokuda R.
6-33-66-3
Sun F.
Uchida K.[6]
6-46-2
Imamura M.
Sin S.
6-46-1