Sumit Nagal vs Henri Squire — Naples CH Round of 32

Naples CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Sumit Nagal
IND
Sumit Nagal
#219ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 March 2026
clay
GER
Henri Squire
#235ATP
1511ELO
1490Clay ELO
25 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLLW
Nagal S.
7-5 3-6 6-4
Squire H.
Nagal S.
7362
Squire H.
5641

Sumit Nagal defeated Henri Squire 7-5 3-6 6-4 in the Naples CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Sumit Nagal came in ranked #219, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Sumit Nagal closed it out in three sets, 7–5 3–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving70% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Squire H.

Squire H.serving70% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Squire H.
1st serve in·Even
71%
69%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.8
5.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.7
4.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (24 vs 31). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Squire H.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
33
42
Break points saved·Clear edge
69
87
Break points won·Clear edge
35
12
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
68
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
33

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nagal S.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Squire H.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.1+47 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.9Clay Elo 1490
4.9Overall Elo 1543
ELO gap
5.1Overall Elo 1511
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
6.3
Surface form
6.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
8.5
4.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Squire H.
Freshness·Dominant
92
61

Nagal S.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d) · Squire H.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 77 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Medjedovic H.[5]
Altmaier D.[1]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[1]
Bondioli F.
6-22-66-1
Medjedovic H.[5]
Sachko V.
7-56-1
Quarter-finals
Sachko V.
Cina F.
6-24-66-1
Altmaier D.[1]
Dalla Valle E.
6-16-3
Bondioli F.
Ribecai M.
6-36-2
Medjedovic H.[5]
Muller A.[3]
6-26-2
R16
Ribecai M.
Martineau M.
2-66-46-2
Muller A.[3]
Caniato C.
4-67-656-4
Cina F.
Forti F.
6-36-3
Altmaier D.[1]
Guerrieri A.
6-44-66-3
Bondioli F.
Nagal S.
6-24-67-5
Medjedovic H.[5]
Sakellaridis S.
6-43-67-5
Sachko V.
Pellegrino A.[6]
4-66-36-4
Dalla Valle E.
Giustino L.
4-66-46-1
R32
Guerrieri A.
Travaglia S.
7-672-67-67
Martineau M.
Wawrinka S.[4]
2-66-47-62
Ribecai M.
Purtseladze S.
6-26-3
Altmaier D.[1]
Damas M.
6-36-1
Giustino L.
Jacquet K.[7]
2-66-46-0
Sachko V.
Blancaneaux G.
6-26-1
Dalla Valle E.
Kukushkin M.
6-13-67-5
Medjedovic H.[5]
Barton H.
6-34-67-62
Sakellaridis S.
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-11-67-5
Pellegrino A.[6]
Jianu F.
6-16-4
Cina F.
Piraino G.
6-46-2
Forti F.
Kopriva V.[2]
6-36-4
Nagal S.
Squire H.
7-53-66-4
Bondioli F.
Blanchet U.[8]
7-656-4
Caniato C.
Vasami J.
6-36-2
Muller A.[3]
Paul J.
7-56-4