Marc Polmans vs Facundo Mena — Morelia CH Round of 32

Morelia CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Marc Polmans
AUS
Marc Polmans
#344ATP
1449ELO
1414Hard ELO
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 March 2026
hard
Facundo Mena
ARG
Facundo Mena
#331ATP
1427ELO
1355Hard ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
Polmans M.
6-3 3-6 7-6
Mena F.
Polmans M.
63772
Mena F.
36651

Marc Polmans defeated Facundo Mena 6-3 3-6 7-6 in the Morelia CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Marc Polmans closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Polmans M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Mena F.

Mena F.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Polmans M.

Serve advantage — Mena F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Polmans M.Mena F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.8
6.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.9
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (16 vs 22). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Polmans M.Mena F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
23
9
Break points saved·Clear edge
79
57
Break points won·Even
10
7
Deciding sets·Even
31
28
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
24
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Polmans M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Mena F.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.7+60 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.3Hard Elo 1355
5.2Overall Elo 1449
ELO gap
4.8Overall Elo 1427
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
5.5
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
5.7
4.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Polmans M.Mena F.
Freshness·Dominant
100
66

Polmans M.: 20 days rest · Mena F.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 88 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Gojo B.[8]
Ficovich J.
7-656-2
Semi-finals
Gojo B.[8]
Mejia N.
6-47-65
Ficovich J.
Pavlovic L.
6-13-66-3
Quarter-finals
Mejia N.
Rodesch C.[6]
4-0
Gojo B.[8]
Pacheco Mendez R.
7-636-4
Ficovich J.
Schoolkate T.[3]
6-37-5
Pavlovic L.
Galarneau A.
7-654-67-65
R16
Ficovich J.
Mochizuki S.[5]
6-736-46-1
Pacheco Mendez R.
Duckworth J.[1]
7-646-3
Gojo B.[8]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-36-767-5
Mejia N.
Martin A.
6-46-4
Rodesch C.[6]
Polmans M.
6-46-4
Schoolkate T.[3]
Andrade A.
6-46-0
Galarneau A.
Yunchaokete B.[7]
7-606-4
Pavlovic L.
Magadan A.
6-46-3
R32
Gojo B.[8]
Krueger M.
7-656-4
Mejia N.
Wong C.[4]
7-57-62
Polmans M.
Mena F.
6-33-67-65
Mochizuki S.[5]
Smith K.
3-66-36-4
Schoolkate T.[3]
Catry R.
7-626-4
Galarneau A.
Tobon M.
7-642-66-3
Yunchaokete B.[7]
Wiskandt M.
7-56-4
Ficovich J.
Alves M.
6-36-1
Andrade A.
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-46-4
Vandecasteele Q.
Zhukayev B.
6-17-64
Pavlovic L.
Walton A.[2]
6-37-5
Martin A.
Kozlov S.
6-26-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Huesler M.
5-76-46-4
Pacheco Mendez R.
Ayeni O.
6-26-4
Rodesch C.[6]
Crawford O.
6-36-3
Magadan A.
Rubio Fierros A.
6-36-2