Hamad Medjedovic vs Vitaliy Sachko — Naples CH Semi-final

Naples CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Hamad Medjedovic
SRB5
Hamad Medjedovic
#68ATP
1841ELO
1816Clay ELO
$736kYTD
$3.0MCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 March 2026
clay
Vitaliy Sachko
UKR
Vitaliy Sachko
#198ATP
1584ELO
1550Clay ELO
$158kYTD
$835kCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLWW
Medjedovic H.
7-5 6-1
Sachko V.
Medjedovic H.
762
Sachko V.
510

Hamad Medjedovic defeated Vitaliy Sachko 7-5 6-1 in the Naples CH semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Hamad Medjedovic came in ranked #68.

Key context

  • Match story: Hamad Medjedovic came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–5 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Medjedovic H.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Sachko V.

Sachko V.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Medjedovic H.

Serve advantage — Medjedovic H.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Medjedovic H.Sachko V.
1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.1
3.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.6
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (22 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Medjedovic H.Sachko V.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
74
51
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
81
Break points won·Slight edge
39
48
Deciding sets·Clear edge
90
76
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Medjedovic H.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Sachko V.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.6+267 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.4Clay Elo 1550
8.6Overall Elo 1841
ELO gap
1.4Overall Elo 1584
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
4.2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 8
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Medjedovic H.Sachko V.
Freshness·Slight edge
95
89

Medjedovic H.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Sachko V.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 17 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Medjedovic H.[5]
Altmaier D.[1]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[1]
Bondioli F.
6-22-66-1
Medjedovic H.[5]
Sachko V.
7-56-1
Quarter-finals
Sachko V.
Cina F.
6-24-66-1
Altmaier D.[1]
Dalla Valle E.
6-16-3
Bondioli F.
Ribecai M.
6-36-2
Medjedovic H.[5]
Muller A.[3]
6-26-2
R16
Ribecai M.
Martineau M.
2-66-46-2
Muller A.[3]
Caniato C.
4-67-656-4
Cina F.
Forti F.
6-36-3
Altmaier D.[1]
Guerrieri A.
6-44-66-3
Bondioli F.
Nagal S.
6-24-67-5
Medjedovic H.[5]
Sakellaridis S.
6-43-67-5
Sachko V.
Pellegrino A.[6]
4-66-36-4
Dalla Valle E.
Giustino L.
4-66-46-1
R32
Guerrieri A.
Travaglia S.
7-672-67-67
Martineau M.
Wawrinka S.[4]
2-66-47-62
Ribecai M.
Purtseladze S.
6-26-3
Altmaier D.[1]
Damas M.
6-36-1
Giustino L.
Jacquet K.[7]
2-66-46-0
Sachko V.
Blancaneaux G.
6-26-1
Dalla Valle E.
Kukushkin M.
6-13-67-5
Medjedovic H.[5]
Barton H.
6-34-67-62
Sakellaridis S.
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-11-67-5
Pellegrino A.[6]
Jianu F.
6-16-4
Cina F.
Piraino G.
6-46-2
Forti F.
Kopriva V.[2]
6-36-4
Nagal S.
Squire H.
7-53-66-4
Bondioli F.
Blanchet U.[8]
7-656-4
Caniato C.
Vasami J.
6-36-2
Muller A.[3]
Paul J.
7-56-4