Hamad Medjedovic vs Alexandre Muller — Naples CH Quarter-final

Naples CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Hamad Medjedovic
SRB5
Hamad Medjedovic
#68ATP
1841ELO
1816Clay ELO
$736kYTD
$3.0MCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 March 2026
clay
Alexandre Muller
FRA3
Alexandre Muller
#126ATP
1665ELO
1628Clay ELO
$426kYTD
$4.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Medjedovic H.
6-2 6-2
Muller A.
Medjedovic H.
662
Muller A.
220

Hamad Medjedovic defeated Alexandre Muller 6-2 6-2 in the Naples CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Hamad Medjedovic came in ranked #68.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Medjedovic H.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Muller A.

Muller A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Medjedovic H.

Serve advantage — Medjedovic H.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Medjedovic H.Muller A.
1st serve in·Even
64%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
48%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
64%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.8
3.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.5
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (22 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Medjedovic H.Muller A.
Clutch Rating·Even
74
75
Break points saved·Even
97
94
Break points won·Slight edge
39
44
Deciding sets·Slight edge
90
95
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
91
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Medjedovic H.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Muller A.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.5+188 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.5Clay Elo 1628
6.4Overall Elo 1841
ELO gap
3.6Overall Elo 1665
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
5.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.2
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Medjedovic H.Muller A.
Freshness·Even
95
98

Medjedovic H.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Muller A.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Medjedovic H.[5]
Altmaier D.[1]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[1]
Bondioli F.
6-22-66-1
Medjedovic H.[5]
Sachko V.
7-56-1
Quarter-finals
Sachko V.
Cina F.
6-24-66-1
Altmaier D.[1]
Dalla Valle E.
6-16-3
Bondioli F.
Ribecai M.
6-36-2
Medjedovic H.[5]
Muller A.[3]
6-26-2
R16
Ribecai M.
Martineau M.
2-66-46-2
Muller A.[3]
Caniato C.
4-67-656-4
Cina F.
Forti F.
6-36-3
Altmaier D.[1]
Guerrieri A.
6-44-66-3
Bondioli F.
Nagal S.
6-24-67-5
Medjedovic H.[5]
Sakellaridis S.
6-43-67-5
Sachko V.
Pellegrino A.[6]
4-66-36-4
Dalla Valle E.
Giustino L.
4-66-46-1
R32
Guerrieri A.
Travaglia S.
7-672-67-67
Martineau M.
Wawrinka S.[4]
2-66-47-62
Ribecai M.
Purtseladze S.
6-26-3
Altmaier D.[1]
Damas M.
6-36-1
Giustino L.
Jacquet K.[7]
2-66-46-0
Sachko V.
Blancaneaux G.
6-26-1
Dalla Valle E.
Kukushkin M.
6-13-67-5
Medjedovic H.[5]
Barton H.
6-34-67-62
Sakellaridis S.
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-11-67-5
Pellegrino A.[6]
Jianu F.
6-16-4
Cina F.
Piraino G.
6-46-2
Forti F.
Kopriva V.[2]
6-36-4
Nagal S.
Squire H.
7-53-66-4
Bondioli F.
Blanchet U.[8]
7-656-4
Caniato C.
Vasami J.
6-36-2
Muller A.[3]
Paul J.
7-56-4