Christopher Li vs Samuel Alejandro Linde Palacios — Bucaramanga CH Round of 32

Bucaramanga CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
PER
Christopher Li
#919ATP
22 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 March 2026
clay
COL
Samuel Alejandro Linde Palacios
#656ATP
18 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWL
Li C.
6-2 6-4
Linde Palacios S.
Li C.
662
Linde Palacios S.
240

Christopher Li defeated Samuel Alejandro Linde Palacios 6-2 6-4 in the Bucaramanga CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Li C.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Linde Palacios S.

Linde Palacios S.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Li C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Li C.Linde Palacios S.
1st serve in·Even
68%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
63%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
40%
46%
Service points won·Even
56%
57%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
48%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.0
2.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.5
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (4 vs 10). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Li C.
3.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 70 days (−1.2)
Linde Palacios S.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
0.0
Surface form
2.2
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 6
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Li C.Linde Palacios S.
Freshness·
—
91

Linde Palacios S.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 22 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Soto M.[2]
Justo G.[1]
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Justo G.[1]
Roncadelli F.[3]
6-23-1
Soto M.[2]
Villalon N.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Justo G.[1]
Nikles J.
6-26-0
Soto M.[2]
Salazar Martinez D.
7-56-1
Roncadelli F.[3]
Rodriguez L.
2-66-36-2
Villalon N.
La Serna J.[4]
4-67-56-4
R16
Justo G.[1]
Marrero Curbelo I.
6-46-2
Villalon N.
Janvier M.
6-46-1
Nikles J.
Kingsley C.
6-46-3
Roncadelli F.[3]
Li C.
6-736-16-1
Rodriguez L.
Johns G.[5]
6-26-1
Salazar Martinez D.
Ambrogi L.[7]
6-06-3
Soto M.[2]
Bertran P.
7-676-0
La Serna J.[4]
Zarate C.
6-36-756-1
R32
Marrero Curbelo I.
George B.
6-32-66-3
Nikles J.
Torrealba B.
7-53-66-2
Kingsley C.
Soriano Barrera A.[6]
6-36-756-3
Roncadelli F.[3]
Heredia S.
4-66-36-4
Rodriguez L.
Gomez J.
6-26-1
Ambrogi L.[7]
Saraiva Dos Santos P.
7-56-0
Bertran P.
Hernandez Ramirez S.
6-43-66-4
Soto M.[2]
Nunez D.
6-17-69
Justo G.[1]
Fernandez B.
7-656-4
Villalon N.
Orlov V.
7-57-5
Zarate C.
Rengifo F.
6-16-3
La Serna J.[4]
Corwin F.
6-37-5
Johns G.[5]
Aboian V.
6-25-76-4
Janvier M.
Estevez J.[8]
6-46-1
Salazar Martinez D.
Osorio J.
6-26-4
Li C.
Linde Palacios S.
6-26-4