Johan Nikles vs Cannon Kingsley — Bucaramanga CH Round of 16

Bucaramanga CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Johan Nikles
SUI
Johan Nikles
#425ATP
1319ELO
1306Clay ELO
29 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 March 2026
clay
USA
Cannon Kingsley
#429ATP
1342ELO
1262Clay ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
Nikles J.
6-4 6-3
Kingsley C.
Nikles J.
662
Kingsley C.
430

Johan Nikles defeated Cannon Kingsley 6-4 6-3 in the Bucaramanga CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Johan Nikles closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nikles J.serving59% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Kingsley C.

Kingsley C.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Nikles J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nikles J.Kingsley C.
1st serve in·Even
59%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
60%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
55%
64%
Return points won·Slight edge
46%
39%
Break points saved·Clear edge
52%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.9
6.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (12 vs 23). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nikles J.Kingsley C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
7
21
Break points saved·Dominant
22
74
Break points won·Slight edge
30
19
Deciding sets·Even
28
27
Tiebreaks·
—
21

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nikles J.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Kingsley C.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.5+44 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Clay Elo 1262
4.7Overall Elo 1319
ELO gap
5.3Overall Elo 1342
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
4.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.5
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Soto M.[2]
Justo G.[1]
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Justo G.[1]
Roncadelli F.[3]
6-23-1
Soto M.[2]
Villalon N.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Justo G.[1]
Nikles J.
6-26-0
Soto M.[2]
Salazar Martinez D.
7-56-1
Roncadelli F.[3]
Rodriguez L.
2-66-36-2
Villalon N.
La Serna J.[4]
4-67-56-4
R16
Justo G.[1]
Marrero Curbelo I.
6-46-2
Villalon N.
Janvier M.
6-46-1
Nikles J.
Kingsley C.
6-46-3
Roncadelli F.[3]
Li C.
6-736-16-1
Rodriguez L.
Johns G.[5]
6-26-1
Salazar Martinez D.
Ambrogi L.[7]
6-06-3
Soto M.[2]
Bertran P.
7-676-0
La Serna J.[4]
Zarate C.
6-36-756-1
R32
Marrero Curbelo I.
George B.
6-32-66-3
Nikles J.
Torrealba B.
7-53-66-2
Kingsley C.
Soriano Barrera A.[6]
6-36-756-3
Roncadelli F.[3]
Heredia S.
4-66-36-4
Rodriguez L.
Gomez J.
6-26-1
Ambrogi L.[7]
Saraiva Dos Santos P.
7-56-0
Bertran P.
Hernandez Ramirez S.
6-43-66-4
Soto M.[2]
Nunez D.
6-17-69
Justo G.[1]
Fernandez B.
7-656-4
Villalon N.
Orlov V.
7-57-5
Zarate C.
Rengifo F.
6-16-3
La Serna J.[4]
Corwin F.
6-37-5
Johns G.[5]
Aboian V.
6-25-76-4
Janvier M.
Estevez J.[8]
6-46-1
Salazar Martinez D.
Osorio J.
6-26-4
Li C.
Linde Palacios S.
6-26-4