Borna Gojo vs Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez — Morelia CH Quarter-final

Morelia CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Borna Gojo
CRO8
Borna Gojo
#175ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 March 2026
hard
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
MEX
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
#338ATP
1527ELO
1487Hard ELO
21 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWW
Gojo B.
7-6 6-4
Pacheco Mendez R.
Gojo B.
7762
Pacheco Mendez R.
6340

Borna Gojo defeated Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez 7-6 6-4 in the Morelia CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gojo B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Pacheco Mendez R.

Pacheco Mendez R.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gojo B.Pacheco Mendez R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
80%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
69%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
70%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.4
5.0
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (25 vs 23). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gojo B.Pacheco Mendez R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
13
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
81
Break points won·Slight edge
10
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
21
Tiebreaks·Dominant
73
1

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gojo B.
7.8
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Pacheco Mendez R.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
7.2+175 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.8Hard Elo 1487
6.9Overall Elo 1683
ELO gap
3.1Overall Elo 1527
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
8.4
Surface form
6.4
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.2
Minutes 14d
7.4
0.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gojo B.Pacheco Mendez R.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
78

Gojo B.: 17 days rest · Pacheco Mendez R.: 4 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Gojo B.[8]
Ficovich J.
7-656-2
Semi-finals
Gojo B.[8]
Mejia N.
6-47-65
Ficovich J.
Pavlovic L.
6-13-66-3
Quarter-finals
Mejia N.
Rodesch C.[6]
4-0
Gojo B.[8]
Pacheco Mendez R.
7-636-4
Ficovich J.
Schoolkate T.[3]
6-37-5
Pavlovic L.
Galarneau A.
7-654-67-65
R16
Ficovich J.
Mochizuki S.[5]
6-736-46-1
Pacheco Mendez R.
Duckworth J.[1]
7-646-3
Gojo B.[8]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-36-767-5
Mejia N.
Martin A.
6-46-4
Rodesch C.[6]
Polmans M.
6-46-4
Schoolkate T.[3]
Andrade A.
6-46-0
Galarneau A.
Yunchaokete B.[7]
7-606-4
Pavlovic L.
Magadan A.
6-46-3
R32
Gojo B.[8]
Krueger M.
7-656-4
Mejia N.
Wong C.[4]
7-57-62
Polmans M.
Mena F.
6-33-67-65
Mochizuki S.[5]
Smith K.
3-66-36-4
Schoolkate T.[3]
Catry R.
7-626-4
Galarneau A.
Tobon M.
7-642-66-3
Yunchaokete B.[7]
Wiskandt M.
7-56-4
Ficovich J.
Alves M.
6-36-1
Andrade A.
Hernandez Serrano J.
6-46-4
Vandecasteele Q.
Zhukayev B.
6-17-64
Pavlovic L.
Walton A.[2]
6-37-5
Martin A.
Kozlov S.
6-26-2
Duckworth J.[1]
Huesler M.
5-76-46-4
Pacheco Mendez R.
Ayeni O.
6-26-4
Rodesch C.[6]
Crawford O.
6-36-3
Magadan A.
Rubio Fierros A.
6-36-2